Society Issues Talk Society Issues Talk    FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich          Society Issues Talk Forum Index -> Liberalism View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message Harry Dope Guest Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:34 am    Post subject: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Valerie Plame was not a covert CIA agent and her identity was not protected by law, which is why nobody was ever indicted for saying her name. Joe Wilson's claims about the White House assertions about Iraq's search for nuclear materials were debunked by a bi-partisan Senate committee, a special British Government inquiry and the CIA itself. Lewis Libby was convicted for telling a grand jury that he learned of Plame's involvement in sending her husband on the Niger trip on Thursday rather than on Monday. The case and verdict say nothing about supposed intelligence manipulation or analyst intimidation, both of which a special bi-partisan committee deemed to be unfounded allegations. The case was all about policy differences and the right of liberals to question a Republican administration's claims without those liberals having their own credibility questioned. The case and verdict had nothing to do with national security. Now people are talking about a potential pardon. While even a former counsel to the Senate Democrats during the Watergate hearings says Libby deserves a pardon, many Democrats demand President Bush to forswear one. All I have to say is that in the Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Server 13 Guest Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:56 am    Post subject: Re: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich "Harry Dope" <IgnorantLiberal@aol.com> wrote in message news:45ef21d3$0$28134$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... Quote: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Valerie Plame was not a covert CIA agent and her identity was not protected by law, which is why nobody was ever indicted for saying her name. Joe Wilson's claims about the White House assertions about Iraq's search for nuclear materials were debunked by a bi-partisan Senate committee, a special British Government inquiry and the CIA itself. Lewis Libby was convicted for telling a grand jury that he learned of Plame's involvement in sending her husband on the Niger trip on Thursday rather than on Monday. The case and verdict say nothing about supposed intelligence manipulation or analyst intimidation, both of which a special bi-partisan committee deemed to be unfounded allegations. The case was all about policy differences and the right of liberals to question a Republican administration's claims without those liberals having their own credibility questioned. The case and verdict had nothing to do with national security. Now people are talking about a potential pardon. While even a former counsel to the Senate Democrats during the Watergate hearings says Libby deserves a pardon, many Democrats demand President Bush to forswear one. All I have to say is that in the More stolen republik00kery. Republicans - all lies, all the time. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor NeverExpectPowerAlways Guest Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:57 am    Post subject: Re: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Harry Dope wrote: Quote: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Valerie Plame was not a covert CIA agent and her identity was not protected by law, which is why nobody was ever indicted for saying her name. Last I checked, blowjobs aren't illegal, either, unless money changes hands. Turnabout is fair play, no? Joe Quote: Wilson's claims about the White House assertions about Iraq's search for nuclear materials were debunked by a bi-partisan Senate committee, a special British Government inquiry and the CIA itself. Lewis Libby was convicted for telling a grand jury that he learned of Plame's involvement in sending her husband on the Niger trip on Thursday rather than on Monday. The case and verdict say nothing about supposed intelligence manipulation or analyst intimidation, both of which a special bi-partisan committee deemed to be unfounded allegations. The case was all about policy differences and the right of liberals to question a Republican administration's claims without those liberals having their own credibility questioned. The case and verdict had nothing to do with national security. Now people are talking about a potential pardon. While even a former counsel to the Senate Democrats during the Watergate hearings says Libby deserves a pardon, many Democrats demand President Bush to forswear one. All I have to say is that in the Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor salad Guest Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:48 am    Post subject: Re: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Harry Dope wrote: Quote: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Valerie Plame was not a covert CIA agent and her identity was not protected by law, which is why nobody was ever indicted for saying her name. Joe Wilson's claims about the White House assertions about Iraq's search for nuclear materials were debunked by a bi-partisan Senate committee, a special British Government inquiry and the CIA itself. Lewis Libby was convicted for telling a grand jury that he learned of Plame's involvement in sending her husband on the Niger trip on Thursday rather than on Monday. I find it funny that Marc Rich's attorney was Scooter Libby. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Riggs Guest Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:55 am    Post subject: Re: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich "Harry Dope" <IgnorantLiberal@aol.com> wrote in news:45ef21d3$0$28134$4c368faf@roadrunner.com: Quote: Valerie Plame was not a covert CIA agent... A lie. -- Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Anon Guest Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:23 am    Post subject: Re: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich "Harry Dope" <IgnorantLiberal@aol.com> wrote in message news:45ef21d3$0$28134$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... Quote: Lewis Libby Is No Marc Rich Valerie Plame was not a covert CIA agent and her identity was not protected by law, which is why nobody was ever indicted for saying her name. Joe Wilson's claims about the White House assertions about Iraq's search for nuclear materials were debunked by a bi-partisan Senate committee, a special British Government inquiry and the CIA itself. Lewis Libby was convicted for telling a grand jury that he learned of Plame's involvement in sending her husband on the Niger trip on Thursday rather than on Monday. The case and verdict say nothing about supposed intelligence manipulation or analyst intimidation, both of which a special bi-partisan committee deemed to be unfounded allegations. The case was all about policy differences and the right of liberals to question a Republican administration's claims without those liberals having their own credibility questioned. The case and verdict had nothing to do with national security. Now people are talking about a potential pardon. While even a former counsel to the Senate Democrats during the Watergate hearings says Libby deserves a pardon, many Democrats demand President Bush to forswear one. All I have to say is that in the Please Bush, pardon Libby. Then everyone will know that this administration is corrupt all the way to the top. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         Society Issues Talk Forum Index -> Liberalism All times are GMT Page 1 of 1   Jump to: Select a forum Society Issues Talk----------------Society Issues TalkDemocracyLiberalism  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum 150 Attacks blocked Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group