Society Issues Talk

St Georges Day April 23rd · Guest

Harvard Hates The White Race?
By Paul Craig Roberts

Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about
stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?

College students will tell you that a university education today is a
guilt trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from
appreciating and absorbing their own culture and to make it difficult
for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations,
etc.) from “people of color.”

To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate
answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”

Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the
anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who
is aware tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to
make a point.

Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s
W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is
the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto,
“treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide
for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of
the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the
new abolitionists

“do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but
reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”

Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable
that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any
opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” Thus does he
put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white
supremacists.”

According to Dr. Ignatiev,

“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the
white race.”

“Make no mistake about it,” he says,

“we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones,
and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white
race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one?
Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If
Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed,
Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish
homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone
imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted
to abolishing the Jewish race?

Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in
their homelands should be abolished.

Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he
received two graduate degrees.

Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] is
showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of
whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business
of American universities.

A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege
of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance
requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently of
ability because of government enforced racial quotas. It is not the
privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies” if blacks
are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the
privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue
if a white replies in kind.

The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they
are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the
white race.

“The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.

I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this
white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are
white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite
widespread opposition to quotas, neither “white” political party will
act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of
equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive non-white
immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain
immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.

But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must
go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.

If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be
apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

Paul Craig Roberts is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are
Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice.

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm

geno4321 · Guest

"St Georges Day April 23rd" <bbbbbdfgdfgdgddfg@googlemail.com> wrote in
message
news:61bc8dae-2fcd-4d98-b45a-5d308dce9bb8@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
Harvard Hates The White Race?
By Paul Craig Roberts

Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about
stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?

College students will tell you that a university education today is a
guilt trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from
appreciating and absorbing their own culture and to make it difficult
for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations,
etc.) from “people of color.”

To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate
answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”

Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the
anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who
is aware tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to
make a point.

Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s
W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is
the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto,
“treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide
for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of
the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the
new abolitionists

“do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but
reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”

Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable
that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any
opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” Thus does he
put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white
supremacists.”

According to Dr. Ignatiev,

“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the
white race.”

“Make no mistake about it,” he says,

“we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones,
and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white
race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one?
Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If
Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed,
Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish
homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone
imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted
to abolishing the Jewish race?

Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in
their homelands should be abolished.

Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he
received two graduate degrees.

Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] is
showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of
whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business
of American universities.

A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege
of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance
requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently of
ability because of government enforced racial quotas. It is not the
privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies” if blacks
are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the
privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue
if a white replies in kind.

The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they
are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the
white race.

“The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.

I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this
white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are
white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite
widespread opposition to quotas, neither “white” political party will
act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of
equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive non-white
immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain
immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.

But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must
go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.

If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be
apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

Paul Craig Roberts is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are
Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice.

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm

Jude Outta Your Mind · Guest

St Georges Day April 23rd wrote:

Rudy Canoza · Guest

On Jul 14, 7:41 am, St Georges Day April 23rd
<bbbbbdfgdfgdgd...@googlemail.com> wrote: