| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zzpat
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:08 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
 |
|
znuybv wrote:
| Quote: |
On Jul 13, 7:35 am, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
O'Boobuh is the losers candidate. Most of his supporters come from high
school drop outs, illegals and the easily fooled
Bush lied about WMD and right wing nuts still supported him. Obama said
he was for change but then voted for the status quo and we're walking
away from him. Is it really that hard for right wing nuts to understand
that we hold the people we support to a standard higher than failure?
--
"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have
alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if
left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He
is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!
|
I'm going to try to help you learn how to think ok, so for me to do this
I'm going to type real slow ok?
Look at the dates. Now, look at them again. All or nearly all of these
quotes came BEFORE the UN inspectors were on the ground in Iraq. As you
know the inspectors were given unfettered access to all sites in Iraq
and they couldn't verify one word of Bush's sorry excuse for
intelligence. By the time we went to war in March there was 100% proof
on the table that Bush was lying, in that the inspectors Bush asked for
couldn't find what Bush claimed was there.
Bush lied to Congress, the media and the American people and you blame
members of Congress for believing his lies. Good grief...are you really
that dumb?
--
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Impeach Search Engine:
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
zzpat
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:15 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
znuybv wrote:
| Quote: |
I don't put much stock in polls. Even when they reflect what I
favor. I tend to think that this election will be a referendum on
Obama. If the American people begin to see him as I do; he will go
down in flames. He is trying his best to hide his liberalism and
inherent anti-Americanism.
|
The only way conservatives can win any election is by changing the
subject to pure idiocy and then keeping the discussion dumbed down so
only complete idiots still want to vote.
Was Bush right about WMD? No.
Was McCain right? No.
Was Bush right about Iraq being part of the war on terror? No.
Was McCain right? No.
Was Bush right when he said we could afford trillions of dollars of tax
cuts? No.
Was McCain right? Yes and No..it depends on which version of McCain
you're looking at. When taxes were being cut McCain was right. Now that
he's running for the presidency he's wrong because now he supports the
tax cuts and the debt created by the tax cuts (almost $4 trillion).
So, if the issues are about who's right and who's wrong McCain won't get
a single vote. But elections are never about these simple facts.
Elections are always about emotions.
Look at 2004. Bush failed us on 911 and WMD...the two largest
intelligence failures in US history and dumb people still voted for him.
The key here is "dumb people." Without dumb people there would be no GOP.
--
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Impeach Search Engine:
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:49 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
"zzpat" <zzpatrick@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g5dn1602h4e@enews2.newsguy.com...
| Quote: |
CB wrote:
Telecom immunity is to protect from law suits by people who are under
investigation by the Feds. The telecoms provide the info only, it's up to
the Feds to make the case based on account information turned over to
them. Why should telecoms he heald responsible for what the Feds do?
Because the Federal government asked the telecoms to break the law -
specifically the Fourth Amendment.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported
by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
|
Believe me, I'm down with all that!
The Feds are after terrorists and their supporters, no one else. Echelon
triggers a closer look at communications between known terrorist states and
within America. I want those communications looked at!
If by chance an innocent 'citizen' is caught up in an unwarranted
investigation there 'is' remedy. It's called 'due process'.
| Quote: |
The telecoms are not above the law. Bush is not above the law and the
Congress can't rewrite the Constitution so it gives Bush powers we haven't
given him.
|
There are legal safeguards built in, litigation. Most civil rights cases are
handled on a contingency basis.
| Quote: |
SCOTUS will strike it down as being unconstitutional but it'll take years.
|
The ACLU is part of the safeguard.
By then any civil cases won't have any standing because
| Quote: |
documents are being destroyed as we talk.
|
Now you're getting paranoid
| Quote: |
Criminal violations are still allowed...but how can a person know if a
crime was committed against them if they're denied access to the records
because they were given immunity?
|
That part isn't protected. Freedom of information will be upheld to defend
ones self. If the Feds screw up and go after an innocent person, any good
lawyer would take the case. I speak from experience. I was falsely accused
by the cops/city and after the ciminal case was thrown out it was my turn. I
settled out of court with a wad of tax free cash!
--
CB
While the form of treachery varies slightly from case to case, liberals
always manage to take the position that most undermines American security.
Ann Coulter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
"zzpat" <zzpatrick@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g5dncn01mte@enews4.newsguy.com...
znuybv wrote:
| Quote: |
On Jul 13, 7:35 am, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
O'Boobuh is the losers candidate. Most of his supporters come from high
school drop outs, illegals and the easily fooled
Bush lied about WMD and right wing nuts still supported him. Obama said
he was for change but then voted for the status quo and we're walking
away from him. Is it really that hard for right wing nuts to understand
that we hold the people we support to a standard higher than failure?
--
"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have
alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if
left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He
is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!
|
I'm going to try to help you learn how to think ok, so for me to do this
I'm going to type real slow ok?
Look at the dates. Now, look at them again. All or nearly all of these
quotes came BEFORE the UN inspectors were on the ground in Iraq. As you
know the inspectors were given unfettered access to all sites in Iraq
and they couldn't verify one word of Bush's sorry excuse for
intelligence. By the time we went to war in March there was 100% proof
on the table that Bush was lying, in that the inspectors Bush asked for
couldn't find what Bush claimed was there.
__
CB:
It only proves Saddamn was a master at deciet. It wasn't the job of
inspectors to 'refind' Saddamn's WMD, it was up to Saddamn to 'prove' he
destroyed them!
__
Bush lied to Congress, the media and the American people and you blame
members of Congress for believing his lies. Good grief...are you really
that dumb?
___________
CB:
No, you're dumb to believe Saddamn's stash just disappeared without a trace.
--
CB
The United Nations is a fine idea. Its members are more of a problem. A
membership that can elect Libya to be in charge of human rights and
seriously contemplate choosing Iraq to supervise disarmament is overstepping
the frontiers of credibility. Delving further into the past yields other
absurdities, prime among them the infamous resolution equating Zionism with
racism.
~~Charles Powell
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/866628/posts
This Cartoon says it all
http://www.ocregister.com/newsimages/opinion/KofiAid80606.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:58 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
"zzpat" <zzpatrick@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g5dnpr01n9f@enews4.newsguy.com...
| Quote: |
znuybv wrote:
I don't put much stock in polls. Even when they reflect what I
favor. I tend to think that this election will be a referendum on
Obama. If the American people begin to see him as I do; he will go
down in flames. He is trying his best to hide his liberalism and
inherent anti-Americanism.
The only way conservatives can win any election is by changing the subject
to pure idiocy and then keeping the discussion dumbed down so only
complete idiots still want to vote.
|
Anyone who values their wallet will vote for McLib. O'Boobuh the Magic
Marxist plans on raising taxes in a declining economy. What will any
business owner do making $250K 'gross' do? Layoff workers, cancel bonuses,
go to a four day work week or move offshore where its bidniz friendly.
| Quote: |
Was Bush right about WMD? No.
Was McCain right? No.
|
Where'd it all go? UN inspectors inventoried them post Desert Storm but that
does matter to you does it?
<snip bloviation>
--
CB
Media cowardice on the truth of Islamo-Facism...
http://cagle.msnbc.com/working/060303/benson.gif |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
znuybv
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:58 pm Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
On Jul 13, 1:08 pm, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
znuybvwrote:
On Jul 13, 7:35 am, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
O'Boobuh is the losers candidate. Most of his supporters come from high
school drop outs, illegals and the easily fooled
Bush lied about WMD and right wing nuts still supported him. Obama said
he was for change but then voted for the status quo and we're walking
away from him. Is it really that hard for right wing nuts to understand
that we hold the people we support to a standard higher than failure?
--
"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have
alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if
left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He
is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!
I'm going to try to help you learn how to think ok, so for me to do this
I'm going to type real slow ok?
Look at the dates. Now, look at them again. All or nearly all of these
quotes came BEFORE the UN inspectors were on the ground in Iraq. As you
know the inspectors were given unfettered access to all sites in Iraq
and they couldn't verify one word of Bush's sorry excuse for
intelligence. By the time we went to war in March there was 100% proof
on the table that Bush was lying, in that the inspectors Bush asked for
couldn't find what Bush claimed was there.
Bush lied to Congress, the media and the American people and you blame
members of Congress for believing his lies. Good grief...are you really
that dumb?
--
Impeach Bushhttp://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Impeach Search Engine:http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm
|
Before or after; what does it matter? It was obvious to all but the
blind that Saddam possessed and was trying to acquire WMD. He also
had used them against the Kurds and in the war with Iran.
Just how dumb are you that you don't know that. My God you are
ignorant! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
znuybv
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
On Jul 13, 7:31 am, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
SURRENDER = CHANGE wrote:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/20...
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
The race for the White House is tied.
-
Newsweek is perplexed:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/145737
Glow Fading?
... But perhaps most puzzling is how McCain could have gained traction in the past month.
LOL.
Perhaps Newsweek accidentally forgot to 0ver-sample democrats by 20%,
this month?...
Intelligent people are walking away from Obama because he's just voted
to give the government more power to conduct illegal wiretapping and he
voted to give telecoms immunity. Giving criminals immunity is what
republicans do. Nixon wanted it. Reagan's men needed it. Bush 41
pardoned Reagan's men. Bush 43 needed both pardons and immunity to
coverup his crimes.
--
Impeach Bushhttp://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Impeach Search Engine:http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm
|
Intelligent people were never with Obama. They saw him for what he
was from the get go. An empty suit, a Liberal who would tell you
anything to get your vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:01 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
"znuybv" <thowilson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1de582e4-252d-4039-8391-fa78347e7145@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 13, 1:08 pm, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
znuybvwrote:
On Jul 13, 7:35 am, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
O'Boobuh is the losers candidate. Most of his supporters come from
high
school drop outs, illegals and the easily fooled
Bush lied about WMD and right wing nuts still supported him. Obama said
he was for change but then voted for the status quo and we're walking
away from him. Is it really that hard for right wing nuts to understand
that we hold the people we support to a standard higher than failure?
--
"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have
alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if
left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He
is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!
I'm going to try to help you learn how to think ok, so for me to do this
I'm going to type real slow ok?
Look at the dates. Now, look at them again. All or nearly all of these
quotes came BEFORE the UN inspectors were on the ground in Iraq. As you
know the inspectors were given unfettered access to all sites in Iraq
and they couldn't verify one word of Bush's sorry excuse for
intelligence. By the time we went to war in March there was 100% proof
on the table that Bush was lying, in that the inspectors Bush asked for
couldn't find what Bush claimed was there.
Bush lied to Congress, the media and the American people and you blame
members of Congress for believing his lies. Good grief...are you really
that dumb?
--
Impeach Bushhttp://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Impeach Search
Engine:http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm
|
Before or after; what does it matter? It was obvious to all but the
blind that Saddam possessed and was trying to acquire WMD. He also
had used them against the Kurds and in the war with Iran.
Just how dumb are you that you don't know that. My God you are
ignorant!
__
They all know that but are Hell bent on doing to Bush what Clinton brought
on him self |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:29 am Post subject: Re: RASMUSSEN: IT'S NOW A TIE! Newsweek poll (remember them? |
|
|
"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:487bdb9d$0$18087$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...
| Quote: |
"znuybv" <thowilson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1de582e4-252d-4039-8391-fa78347e7145@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 13, 1:08 pm, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
znuybvwrote:
On Jul 13, 7:35 am, zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
CB wrote:
O'Boobuh is the losers candidate. Most of his supporters come from
high
school drop outs, illegals and the easily fooled
Bush lied about WMD and right wing nuts still supported him. Obama
said
he was for change but then voted for the status quo and we're walking
away from him. Is it really that hard for right wing nuts to
understand
that we hold the people we support to a standard higher than failure?
--
"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have
alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if
left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He
is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of
Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!
I'm going to try to help you learn how to think ok, so for me to do this
I'm going to type real slow ok?
Look at the dates. Now, look at them again. All or nearly all of these
quotes came BEFORE the UN inspectors were on the ground in Iraq. As you
know the inspectors were given unfettered access to all sites in Iraq
and they couldn't verify one word of Bush's sorry excuse for
intelligence. By the time we went to war in March there was 100% proof
on the table that Bush was lying, in that the inspectors Bush asked for
couldn't find what Bush claimed was there.
Bush lied to Congress, the media and the American people and you blame
members of Congress for believing his lies. Good grief...are you really
that dumb?
--
Impeach Bushhttp://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Impeach Search
Engine:http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm
Before or after; what does it matter? It was obvious to all but the
blind that Saddam possessed and was trying to acquire WMD. He also
had used them against the Kurds and in the war with Iran.
Just how dumb are you that you don't know that. My God you are
ignorant!
__
They all know that but are Hell bent on doing to Bush what Clinton brought
on him self
-- |
CB
Clinton after he was fined for perjury
http://www.angelfire.com/md2/Ldotvets/images/grotesk.jpg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
150 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
