| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steve
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:59 pm Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
 |
|
On 3-Jul-2008, Hans Metterling <hans.metterling@SNIPITgmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Boy, you ignorant racist pukes sure are scared shitless...
Cool!
Maybe you Nazi wannabe idiots will finally get the hint...
|
Clever. 4 mindless names, no thoughts. Must be a Toyota driving Walmart
shopper. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Steve
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:05 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On 7-Jul-2008, Hans Metterling <hans.metterling@SNIPITgmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
You want Choke-n-Puke, rightard? Speaking of food for thought, this little
dose of reality will really make yer stupid goober ass choke and puke...
The results of Zogby's state by state polling of all 50 states and an
analysis of other state polling by Zogby shows Barack Obama is kicking
John
McCain's wrinkled old ass all over the electoral vote map.
Zogby is the latest to weigh in with a prediction of electoral vote totals
based on state by state polling.
In the most extensive state by state polling yet, Zogby's findings fit
perfectly with other predictions that show that with 4 moths left to go
until election day, Barack Obama has already built an insurmountable lead
in
electoral votes and continues to gain momentum.
|
Tried English as a second language?
Never said anything against BO; he's definitely the more coherent of the two
lackeys that you are given as options. Neither are suitable, but BO is
certainly more aware of his immediate surroundings.
The real problem is that the lemmings embrace the 2 ruling syndicates like
they're somehow "official" or designated. They are not; they are merely
successful at pulling the wool over the eyes of the sheep. Baaahhhhhhhhh |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Steve
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:07 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On 8-Jul-2008, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
| Quote: |
There are plenty of nails yet to pounded into the GOP coffin.
And 40 senate seats to trim.
|
Eliminate the senate. Any of you losers know its purpose? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
The Trucker
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:25 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:07:16 +0000, Steve wrote:
| Quote: |
On 8-Jul-2008, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
There are plenty of nails yet to pounded into the GOP coffin.
And 40 senate seats to trim.
Eliminate the senate. Any of you losers know its purpose?
|
I agree with that. It's purpose is to fear the "swift boat" and to be
held in ones station by big telco money.
--
"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers
of society but the people themselves; and
if we think them not enlightened enough to
exercise their control with a wholesome
discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them, but to inform their discretion by
education." - Thomas Jefferson
http://GreaterVoice.org/extend |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
The Trucker
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:48 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:05:34 +0000, Steve wrote:
| Quote: |
On 7-Jul-2008, Hans Metterling <hans.metterling@SNIPITgmail.com> wrote:
You want Choke-n-Puke, rightard? Speaking of food for thought, this little
dose of reality will really make yer stupid goober ass choke and puke...
The results of Zogby's state by state polling of all 50 states and an
analysis of other state polling by Zogby shows Barack Obama is kicking
John
McCain's wrinkled old ass all over the electoral vote map.
Zogby is the latest to weigh in with a prediction of electoral vote totals
based on state by state polling.
In the most extensive state by state polling yet, Zogby's findings fit
perfectly with other predictions that show that with 4 moths left to go
until election day, Barack Obama has already built an insurmountable lead
in
electoral votes and continues to gain momentum.
Tried English as a second language?
Never said anything against BO; he's definitely the more coherent of the two
lackeys that you are given as options. Neither are suitable, but BO is
certainly more aware of his immediate surroundings.
The real problem is that the lemmings embrace the 2 ruling syndicates like
they're somehow "official" or designated. They are not; they are merely
successful at pulling the wool over the eyes of the sheep. Baaahhhhhhhhh
|
I think what the two "syndicates" (and there really may be only one, and a
lot of Oscar winning performances) want things to stay real close. I can
sense the Democrats doing all they can to prevent an all out blowout. They
(the Democrats) do not want a situation to emerge where they are naked in
the face of those they have been elected to represent. They want the
Republicans around to blame for whatever goes wrong. If they were to get
a huge majority and the seated Democrats were to continue their lobby
sucking then the primary challenges in 2010 would Liebermanize a whole
slew of Democrats and those that survived might even get beat by a
Republican. The Republicans would have a chance to run on actual issues
and on showing that the incumbent voted against the wishes of the people.
Politicians dread having to be accountable and they love having an
opposition party that is hated and feared and despised. So long as the
number of seats is close, then the Democrats can get away with a lot of
traitorous crap like the telco immunity. But if they had a 100 seat
majority in the House, then people would be able to replace more of them
with candidates that actually campaigned on the issues and on the failure
of the current incumbent. I know that this is a real laugh right now as
the Republicans campaign on slandering the opponent and on wedge issues
and moral pig prancing and lock stepped obedience to The Party. But if the
House was big majority Democratic then each seated Democrat would have
much more to fear from a possibly revamped Republican group.
--
"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers
of society but the people themselves; and
if we think them not enlightened enough to
exercise their control with a wholesome
discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them, but to inform their discretion by
education." - Thomas Jefferson
http://GreaterVoice.org/extend |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Steve
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:44 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On 11-Jul-2008, The Trucker <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
I think what the two "syndicates" (and there really may be only one, and a
lot of Oscar winning performances) want things to stay real close. I can
sense the Democrats doing all they can to prevent an all out blowout. They
(the Democrats) do not want a situation to emerge where they are naked in
the face of those they have been elected to represent. They want the
Republicans around to blame for whatever goes wrong. If they were to get
a huge majority and the seated Democrats were to continue their lobby
sucking then the primary challenges in 2010 would Liebermanize a whole
slew of Democrats and those that survived might even get beat by a
Republican. The Republicans would have a chance to run on actual issues
and on showing that the incumbent voted against the wishes of the people.
Politicians dread having to be accountable and they love having an
opposition party that is hated and feared and despised. So long as the
number of seats is close, then the Democrats can get away with a lot of
traitorous crap like the telco immunity. But if they had a 100 seat
majority in the House, then people would be able to replace more of them
with candidates that actually campaigned on the issues and on the failure
of the current incumbent. I know that this is a real laugh right now as
the Republicans campaign on slandering the opponent and on wedge issues
and moral pig prancing and lock stepped obedience to The Party. But if the
House was big majority Democratic then each seated Democrat would have
much more to fear from a possibly revamped Republican group.
|
Very well put, and the inverse is also true. That's why both syndicares must
be made to fear, daily, having to find a legitimate source of income.
Flush the toilette. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Hans Metterling
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:27 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:05:34 GMT, "Steve" <NorfolkRagBaggerREMOVE@cox.net>
wrote:
| Quote: |
On 7-Jul-2008, Hans Metterling <hans.metterling@SNIPITgmail.com> wrote:
You want Choke-n-Puke, rightard? Speaking of food for thought, this little
dose of reality will really make yer stupid goober ass choke and puke...
The results of Zogby's state by state polling of all 50 states and an
analysis of other state polling by Zogby shows Barack Obama is kicking
John
McCain's wrinkled old ass all over the electoral vote map.
Zogby is the latest to weigh in with a prediction of electoral vote totals
based on state by state polling.
In the most extensive state by state polling yet, Zogby's findings fit
perfectly with other predictions that show that with 4 moths left to go
until election day, Barack Obama has already built an insurmountable lead
in
electoral votes and continues to gain momentum.
Tried English as a second language?
|
Not tried not stupid as a second option? Apparently not...
| Quote: |
Never said anything against BO; he's definitely the more coherent of the two
lackeys that you are given as options. Neither are suitable, but BO is
certainly more aware of his immediate surroundings.
|
Which you think has what to do with the meta polling I cited, specifically?
| Quote: |
The real problem is that the lemmings embrace the 2 ruling syndicates like
they're somehow "official" or designated. They are not; they are merely
successful at pulling the wool over the eyes of the sheep. Baaahhhhhhhhh
|
Ah. Gotcha. You're another loonytarian. Good luck with Bob <snicker> Barr...
---
The Metterling List
List No. 5
6 undershirts
6 shorts
6 handkerchiefs
has always puzzled scholars, principally because of the total absence of socks.
-The Collected Laundry Lists of Hans Metterling, Vol. I, 437 pp., plus xxxii-page introduction; indexed; $18.75,
Venal & Sons |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Hans Metterling
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:42 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:59:11 GMT, "Steve" <NorfolkRagBaggerREMOVE@cox.net>
wrote:
| Quote: |
On 3-Jul-2008, Hans Metterling <hans.metterling@SNIPITgmail.com> wrote:
Boy, you ignorant racist pukes sure are scared shitless...
Cool!
Maybe you Nazi wannabe idiots will finally get the hint...
Clever. 4 mindless names, no thoughts. Must be a Toyota driving Walmart
shopper.
|
Why, that's amazing! You're every bit as correct as you usually are! How do
you do it!
With stupid guesses about that which you know entirely not shit,
apparently...
Ain't you the klever psychic. Any more asinine prognostications you're
compelled beyond reason to fart? Let's have 'em...
"Wait, I see it all clearly, now... Nixon will resign!"
---
The Metterling List
List No. 5
6 undershirts
6 shorts
6 handkerchiefs
has always puzzled scholars, principally because of the total absence of socks.
-The Collected Laundry Lists of Hans Metterling, Vol. I, 437 pp., plus xxxii-page introduction; indexed; $18.75,
Venal & Sons |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Steve
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:42 am Post subject: Re: More food for thought |
|
|
On 14-Jul-2008, Hans Metterling <hans.metterling@SNIPITgmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Why, that's amazing! You're every bit as correct as you usually are! How
do
you do it!
|
You're right, you win. I should be like 30 million of fools and "root" for
one or the other "parties" that have been sticking it up your ass since
1960.
My real regret is that I have to pay for your follies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
147 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
