| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Republican Liar
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
 |
|
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
| Quote: |
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote
in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400,
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
their Panties" <anti gun liberal
k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are
high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to their
advantage to keep gas prices high
through November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and bless
Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling bring
down the price of gasoline by November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that oil
today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the price
down by November or anytime soon, and it
may not bring it down in the future as oil
will be more and more in demand, but if we
had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil
would be on-line today and prices might not
be as high as they are. So let's start now
for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get
the six year old next door to read it to
you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies and
destroyed the economy in the process there
wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure
are a stupid bunch if you think this is all
about oil suddenly disappearing and you are
more ignorant than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil drilling
much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't
the right open ANWR when they had complete
control of both houses and the WhiteHouse
for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the
filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It
was they who were responsible for the defeat of
the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars
continue lying and blaming the left for your
failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of
the number needed to prevent opponents using a
filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the
vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster,
with the tally standing at 56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully
read the link you would see that what I posted
came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part
voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill.
A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not
change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those
to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote
his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to
vote against it and he won't be the last. You just
can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying
can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet
a few individuals from another party who vote
against a bill are ones who are responsible for
stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original question.
You are unable to answer so you continue to remain
ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans
voted to block oil drilling for so long. I have been
asking this for some time and haven't found one tard
that can answer. You are just one more clueless
simpleton so you run like the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a loon
who says that a party who votes as a block against Anwar
is not responsible for blocking the drilling, but the
party who had a few individuals vote against drilling is
the party responsible for blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a complete
waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment on
the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places so you
again try to weasel. Nothing new for you Tards. The right
has successfully blocked oil drilling for decades. Deal
with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
|
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the RightTard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
cmdr buzz corey
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:36 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit slow aren't you?
|
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats in Congress are
voting against drilling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:04 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:1ffc899d-b051-4cd8-9305-6a55268b5cc5@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
| Quote: |
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit slow
aren't you?
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats in
Congress are voting against drilling.
|
Explain why the right has been voting to block drilling. Why did Frist
vote again his own bill? If he had joined with other republicans and didn't
vote to block drilling the price of oil wouldn't be so high right now. Why
have the republicans been so successful in causing oil prices to rise? I
have been asking this for some time. By avoiding my question only makes you
look entirely stupid. The right is directly responsible for the high oil
prices. Just one more screw. No wonder America is calling for you fools to
be replaced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
nobody
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:04 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:30:09 -0400, "Republican Liar"
<Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:il1o64lkadgqf4sdq67oq3c79ah668i50v@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:28:46 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2qhm64thl8n9532m4kn7rtavsg06jebot1@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:44:03 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman"
jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com
wrote in message
news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Now........If you have any balls at all
please explain why republicans voted to block
drilling.
Waahahahahahahaa...................
Now if you have any brains, (obviously you
don't ) please explain why the simple minded
dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
Big oil has leases on 68 million acres.
Democrats are against giving them any MORE. Why
aren't they developing what they already have?
Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres
or it is cost prohibitive to get it?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories
"Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback.
Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or
any other legitimate cite that there is tons of
oil on the land of those leases and the oil
companies could economically drill for it but
aren't. You seem long on whines, short on cites.
It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard
like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your
own and need someone to tell you how to think. You
need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of
reality.
Of course you are fool enough to think that I agree
with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that the land
has oil on it and it can be drilled for economically
or not?
It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more
oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then
they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil
can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you
ever done any researching for yourself or have you
only relied on others to tell you what to think? I
would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one
clues about the oil available in Russia and other
parts of the world. I can provide you with links but
I want you to show me that you know more than what
Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an
ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I showed
you anyway.
Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with
the claim that land that is already leased has oil
waiting for the drilling and this is why more land
should not be leased for drilling. Care to try again?
Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land
already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay
attention?
I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you
have difficulty following a thread since the subject of
the oil leases is what I've been talking about.
Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual topic...
You are retarded. If you had been following the thread
you would see what a total fool you are. The thread is
not about oil leases moron, it is about blocking drilling.
Really? Perhaps you should have explained that when the
subject of leases was introduced into the thread in
message 17 of the thread.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/a3652e91ff772420?dmode=source
It looks like you need many things explained to you if you expect me to
explain something I never commented on. Pay attention moron.
|
Then why did you respond in:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/06d9d69ab68251c4?dmode=source
| Quote: |
"Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are
against giving them
any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already
have?"
Again moron, that is not anything I posted fool. You must like making an ass
out of yourself.
|
I didn't say you did "moron". This was part of a conversation *you*
insuated yourself in and got more high and mighty with each post. You
are far more clueless than I gave you credit for.
| Quote: |
I was conversing with him when you insinuated yourself
into the discussion. If you don't believe the subject of
leases for oil is relevant to the discussion, then why on
earth have you responded to me when it's clear that's the
discussion I was engaged in?
Wahahaha......IOW you took over the thread and demand I have no right to
comment. You make a bigger ass out of yourself with every line you post. You
are retarded.
|
I did no such thing. I've already cited where the detour took place
and it wasn't by me. In short, get a clue, get a life, learn to
comprehend, and grow the heck up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
nobody
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:04 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:32:23 -0400, "Republican Liar"
<Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote
in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400,
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
their Panties" <anti gun liberal
k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are
high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to their
advantage to keep gas prices high
through November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and bless
Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling bring
down the price of gasoline by November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that oil
today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the price
down by November or anytime soon, and it
may not bring it down in the future as oil
will be more and more in demand, but if we
had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil
would be on-line today and prices might not
be as high as they are. So let's start now
for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get
the six year old next door to read it to
you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies and
destroyed the economy in the process there
wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure
are a stupid bunch if you think this is all
about oil suddenly disappearing and you are
more ignorant than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil drilling
much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't
the right open ANWR when they had complete
control of both houses and the WhiteHouse
for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the
filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It
was they who were responsible for the defeat of
the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars
continue lying and blaming the left for your
failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of
the number needed to prevent opponents using a
filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the
vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster,
with the tally standing at 56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully
read the link you would see that what I posted
came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part
voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill.
A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not
change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those
to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote
his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to
vote against it and he won't be the last. You just
can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying
can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet
a few individuals from another party who vote
against a bill are ones who are responsible for
stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original question.
You are unable to answer so you continue to remain
ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans
voted to block oil drilling for so long. I have been
asking this for some time and haven't found one tard
that can answer. You are just one more clueless
simpleton so you run like the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a loon
who says that a party who votes as a block against Anwar
is not responsible for blocking the drilling, but the
party who had a few individuals vote against drilling is
the party responsible for blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a complete
waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment on
the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places so you
again try to weasel. Nothing new for you Tards. The right
has successfully blocked oil drilling for decades. Deal
with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the RightTard.
|
I've not run from anything. You've just proven yourself unable to
comprehend anything that doesn't fit your thinking (such as blaming a
minority who voted against a bill for the failure of the bill but not
the majority that voted as a block against it).
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
cmdr buzz corey
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 pm Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Jul 3, 2:25 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:1ffc899d-b051-4cd8-9305-6a55268b5cc5@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit slow
aren't you?
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats in
Congress are voting against drilling.
Explain why the right has been voting to block drilling. Why did Frist
vote again his own bill? If he had joined with other republicans and didn't
vote to block drilling the price of oil wouldn't be so high right now. Why
have the republicans been so successful in causing oil prices to rise? I
have been asking this for some time. By avoiding my question only makes you
look entirely stupid. The right is directly responsible for the high oil
prices. Just one more screw. No wonder America is calling for you fools to
be replaced.
|
Explain why the current simple-minded dummycrats are voting to block
drilling. By avoiding my question you make yourself look as stupid as
you really are. Have you worked hard in your life to become this
stupid or does it come naturally? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
George Grapman
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
What was the stance of Jeb Bush on drilling?
How did Bill Frist vote?
What guarantees exist that the oil will not be old to other countries? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:15 pm Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Jul 3, 1:56 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:25a458aa-3ca6-4be8-87fb-a5ea7f259eb5@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
On Jul 3, 2:25 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:1ffc899d-b051-4cd8-9305-6a55268b5cc5@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit
slow aren't you?
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats in
Congress are voting against drilling.
Explain why the right has been voting to block
drilling. Why did Frist vote again his own bill? If he
had joined with other republicans and didn't vote to
block drilling the price of oil wouldn't be so high
right now. Why have the republicans been so successful
in causing oil prices to rise? I have been asking this
for some time. By avoiding my question only makes you
look entirely stupid. The right is directly responsible
for the high oil prices. Just one more screw. No wonder
America is calling for you fools to be replaced.
Explain why the current simple-minded dummycrats are
voting to block drilling. By avoiding my question you
make yourself look as stupid as you really are. Have you
worked hard in your life to become this stupid or does it
come naturally?
No jackass. I asked why the right has been voting to block drilling and has
succeeded since Bush took office. By you avoiding the question I asked first
you are the one that is cowardly running for the issue. You RightTards have
always been running so nothing new here. The right is the party of lies and
obstruction. You personally are a lowlife coward.
|
It is the simpe-minded dummycraps that are voting against drilling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 12:56 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:25a458aa-3ca6-4be8-87fb-a5ea7f259eb5@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
| Quote: |
On Jul 3, 2:25 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:1ffc899d-b051-4cd8-9305-6a55268b5cc5@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit
slow aren't you?
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats in
Congress are voting against drilling.
Explain why the right has been voting to block
drilling. Why did Frist vote again his own bill? If he
had joined with other republicans and didn't vote to
block drilling the price of oil wouldn't be so high
right now. Why have the republicans been so successful
in causing oil prices to rise? I have been asking this
for some time. By avoiding my question only makes you
look entirely stupid. The right is directly responsible
for the high oil prices. Just one more screw. No wonder
America is calling for you fools to be replaced.
Explain why the current simple-minded dummycrats are
voting to block drilling. By avoiding my question you
make yourself look as stupid as you really are. Have you
worked hard in your life to become this stupid or does it
come naturally?
|
No jackass. I asked why the right has been voting to block drilling and has
succeeded since Bush took office. By you avoiding the question I asked first
you are the one that is cowardly running for the issue. You RightTards have
always been running so nothing new here. The right is the party of lies and
obstruction. You personally are a lowlife coward. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 12:58 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"George Grapman" <sfgeorge@paccbell.net> wrote in message
news:wi7bk.31212$ZE5.21257@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com
| Quote: |
What was the stance of Jeb Bush on drilling?
How did Bill Frist vote?
What guarantees exist that the oil will not be old to
other countries?
The loser has no answer. He will run from any question asked unless he gets |
a talking point from Fox or Rush. Poor pathetic RightTard can't think on his
own. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:27 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:b4bp64l0jpvvt43s0cvop8socuo0pda20c@4ax.com
| Quote: |
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:30:09 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:il1o64lkadgqf4sdq67oq3c79ah668i50v@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:28:46 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2qhm64thl8n9532m4kn7rtavsg06jebot1@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:44:03 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman"
jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Now........If you have any balls at all
please explain why republicans voted to
block drilling.
Waahahahahahahaa...................
Now if you have any brains, (obviously you
don't ) please explain why the simple minded
dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
Big oil has leases on 68 million acres.
Democrats are against giving them any MORE.
Why aren't they developing what they already
have?
Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres
or it is cost prohibitive to get it?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories
"Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback.
Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite
or any other legitimate cite that there is tons
of oil on the land of those leases and the oil
companies could economically drill for it but
aren't. You seem long on whines, short on
cites.
It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard
like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your
own and need someone to tell you how to think. You
need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of
reality.
Of course you are fool enough to think that I
agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that
the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for
economically or not?
It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more
oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then
they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil
can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you
ever done any researching for yourself or have you
only relied on others to tell you what to think? I
would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one
clues about the oil available in Russia and other
parts of the world. I can provide you with links but
I want you to show me that you know more than what
Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an
ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I
showed you anyway.
Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with
the claim that land that is already leased has oil
waiting for the drilling and this is why more land
should not be leased for drilling. Care to try
again?
Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land
already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay
attention?
I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you
have difficulty following a thread since the subject
of the oil leases is what I've been talking about.
Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual topic...
You are retarded. If you had been following the thread
you would see what a total fool you are. The thread is
not about oil leases moron, it is about blocking
drilling.
Really? Perhaps you should have explained that when the
subject of leases was introduced into the thread in
message 17 of the thread.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/a3652e91ff772420?dmode=source
It looks like you need many things explained to you if
you expect me to explain something I never commented on.
Pay attention moron.
Then why did you respond in:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/06d9d69ab68251c4?dmode=source
"Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are
against giving them
any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already
have?"
Again moron, that is not anything I posted fool. You must
like making an ass out of yourself.
I didn't say you did "moron". This was part of a
conversation *you* insuated yourself in and got more high
and mighty with each post. You are far more clueless
than I gave you credit for.
I was conversing with him when you insinuated yourself
into the discussion. If you don't believe the subject
of leases for oil is relevant to the discussion, then
why on earth have you responded to me when it's clear
that's the discussion I was engaged in?
Wahahaha......IOW you took over the thread and demand I
have no right to comment. You make a bigger ass out of
yourself with every line you post. You are retarded.
I did no such thing. I've already cited where the detour
took place and it wasn't by me. In short, get a clue,
get a life, learn to comprehend, and grow the heck up.
|
Man you are one stupid tard. You are the one that has no clue moron. You
definitely have your head screwed on a bit twisted. Try reading what you
post and see what a fool you become in such short time. You attempt a
"detour" because you made an ass out of yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:38 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:5ibp6413n48kopst6c2qvonqiha1l16ue6@4ax.com
| Quote: |
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:32:23 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote
in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400,
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
their Panties" <anti gun liberal
k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are
high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to their
advantage to keep gas prices high
through November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and bless
Pelosi and her herd of Democrat
morons.
So, how would voting for drilling bring
down the price of gasoline by November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that oil
today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the price
down by November or anytime soon, and it
may not bring it down in the future as
oil will be more and more in demand, but
if we had started drilling 10 years ago,
that oil would be on-line today and
prices might not be as high as they are.
So let's start now for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp,
get the six year old next door to read
it to you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies and
destroyed the economy in the process there
wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure
are a stupid bunch if you think this is all
about oil suddenly disappearing and you are
more ignorant than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil drilling
much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't
the right open ANWR when they had complete
control of both houses and the WhiteHouse
for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used
the filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR?
It was they who were responsible for the
defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why
do you liars continue lying and blaming the
left for your failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes short
of the number needed to prevent opponents
using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to
derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster,
with the tally standing at 56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you
actaully read the link you would see that what
I posted came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part
voted as a block resulting in stopping the
bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster
does not change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among
those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to
vote his own bill down. He was not the only
RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the
last. You just can't live without thinking that
Fox has been lying can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet
a few individuals from another party who vote
against a bill are ones who are responsible for
stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original
question. You are unable to answer so you continue
to remain ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans
voted to block oil drilling for so long. I have been
asking this for some time and haven't found one tard
that can answer. You are just one more clueless
simpleton so you run like the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a loon
who says that a party who votes as a block against
Anwar is not responsible for blocking the drilling,
but the party who had a few individuals vote against
drilling is the party responsible for blocking the
bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a complete
waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment on
the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places so you
again try to weasel. Nothing new for you Tards. The
right has successfully blocked oil drilling for
decades. Deal with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the
RightTard.
I've not run from anything. You've just proven yourself
unable to comprehend anything that doesn't fit your
thinking (such as blaming a minority who voted against a
bill for the failure of the bill but not the majority
that voted as a block against it).
|
The bill failed because it was voted down by the majority party that
proposed it. If the right had not voted it down it would have beaten any
filibuster if it occurred. You sure are lame. Try again to answer why the
republicans voted against their own bill. You think you have a point by
blaming the left when the right is guilty. You are a stupid one aren't you?
Maybe if you did some actual reading instead of listening to Fox you might
actually get an education. The republicans have been blocking oil drilling
since Bush took office. If that were not the case the drilling would have
started long ago and there would be no $4. plus per gallon of gas. The left
votes to block drilling in ANWR because it will do nothing to lower the
price of oil.
Now, moron, if you have any real questions feel free to ask before you
repeat the lies told to you by Fox and the right-wing mindless troll that
post on these groups.
You tards must really be pissed that the government will be occupied by
liberals from now on. LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:57 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
<TypicalWhitePerson@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:ff1e77d0-1992-4cd8-bf49-ebfd5303bb30@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
| Quote: |
On Jul 3, 1:56 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:25a458aa-3ca6-4be8-87fb-a5ea7f259eb5@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
On Jul 3, 2:25 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com
wrote in
messagenews:1ffc899d-b051-4cd8-9305-6a55268b5cc5@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit
slow aren't you?
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats
in Congress are voting against drilling.
Explain why the right has been voting to block
drilling. Why did Frist vote again his own bill? If he
had joined with other republicans and didn't vote to
block drilling the price of oil wouldn't be so high
right now. Why have the republicans been so successful
in causing oil prices to rise? I have been asking this
for some time. By avoiding my question only makes you
look entirely stupid. The right is directly
responsible for the high oil prices. Just one more
screw. No wonder America is calling for you fools to
be replaced.
Explain why the current simple-minded dummycrats are
voting to block drilling. By avoiding my question you
make yourself look as stupid as you really are. Have
you worked hard in your life to become this stupid or
does it come naturally?
No jackass. I asked why the right has been voting to
block drilling and has succeeded since Bush took office.
By you avoiding the question I asked first you are the
one that is cowardly running for the issue. You
RightTards have always been running so nothing new here.
The right is the party of lies and obstruction. You
personally are a lowlife coward.
It is the simpe-minded dummycraps that are voting against
drilling.
|
It is obstructionist RightTards that have refused to pass drilling bills
since Bush was elected. As I have proven they have been voting against their
own bills which if passed there would be no $4 plus gas prices. You moron
tards are just to stupid to even be able to answer WHY the right has refused
to pass their own bills of try to push more through. You are a perfect
example of simply repeating the same chant over and over while remaining
clueless. I should start keeping score as to just how many of you morons
post the same word for word shallow responses. You tards are the stupidest
people to ever post on usenet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
nobody
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:27:59 -0400, "Republican Liar"
<Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:b4bp64l0jpvvt43s0cvop8socuo0pda20c@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:30:09 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:il1o64lkadgqf4sdq67oq3c79ah668i50v@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:28:46 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2qhm64thl8n9532m4kn7rtavsg06jebot1@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:44:03 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman"
jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Now........If you have any balls at all
please explain why republicans voted to
block drilling.
Waahahahahahahaa...................
Now if you have any brains, (obviously you
don't ) please explain why the simple minded
dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
Big oil has leases on 68 million acres.
Democrats are against giving them any MORE.
Why aren't they developing what they already
have?
Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres
or it is cost prohibitive to get it?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories
"Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback.
Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite
or any other legitimate cite that there is tons
of oil on the land of those leases and the oil
companies could economically drill for it but
aren't. You seem long on whines, short on
cites.
It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard
like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your
own and need someone to tell you how to think. You
need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of
reality.
Of course you are fool enough to think that I
agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that
the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for
economically or not?
It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more
oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then
they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil
can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you
ever done any researching for yourself or have you
only relied on others to tell you what to think? I
would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one
clues about the oil available in Russia and other
parts of the world. I can provide you with links but
I want you to show me that you know more than what
Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an
ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I
showed you anyway.
Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with
the claim that land that is already leased has oil
waiting for the drilling and this is why more land
should not be leased for drilling. Care to try
again?
Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land
already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay
attention?
I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you
have difficulty following a thread since the subject
of the oil leases is what I've been talking about.
Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual topic...
You are retarded. If you had been following the thread
you would see what a total fool you are. The thread is
not about oil leases moron, it is about blocking
drilling.
Really? Perhaps you should have explained that when the
subject of leases was introduced into the thread in
message 17 of the thread.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/a3652e91ff772420?dmode=source
It looks like you need many things explained to you if
you expect me to explain something I never commented on.
Pay attention moron.
Then why did you respond in:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/06d9d69ab68251c4?dmode=source
"Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are
against giving them
any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already
have?"
Again moron, that is not anything I posted fool. You must
like making an ass out of yourself.
I didn't say you did "moron". This was part of a
conversation *you* insuated yourself in and got more high
and mighty with each post. You are far more clueless
than I gave you credit for.
I was conversing with him when you insinuated yourself
into the discussion. If you don't believe the subject
of leases for oil is relevant to the discussion, then
why on earth have you responded to me when it's clear
that's the discussion I was engaged in?
Wahahaha......IOW you took over the thread and demand I
have no right to comment. You make a bigger ass out of
yourself with every line you post. You are retarded.
I did no such thing. I've already cited where the detour
took place and it wasn't by me. In short, get a clue,
get a life, learn to comprehend, and grow the heck up.
Man you are one stupid tard. You are the one that has no clue moron. You
definitely have your head screwed on a bit twisted. Try reading what you
post and see what a fool you become in such short time. You attempt a
"detour" because you made an ass out of yourself.
|
As I demonstrated with an acutal cite (you haven't been real good with
that), I didn't detour. I responded to someone who had *already*
detoured.
The hysterical part of all this is that you're completely clueless and
accuse everyone else of being "stupid tards". What an interesting
little world you live in.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
nobody
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:29 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:38:12 -0400, "Republican Liar"
<Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:5ibp6413n48kopst6c2qvonqiha1l16ue6@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:32:23 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote
in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400,
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
their Panties" <anti gun liberal
k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are
high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to their
advantage to keep gas prices high
through November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and bless
Pelosi and her herd of Democrat
morons.
So, how would voting for drilling bring
down the price of gasoline by November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that oil
today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the price
down by November or anytime soon, and it
may not bring it down in the future as
oil will be more and more in demand, but
if we had started drilling 10 years ago,
that oil would be on-line today and
prices might not be as high as they are.
So let's start now for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp,
get the six year old next door to read
it to you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies and
destroyed the economy in the process there
wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure
are a stupid bunch if you think this is all
about oil suddenly disappearing and you are
more ignorant than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil drilling
much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't
the right open ANWR when they had complete
control of both houses and the WhiteHouse
for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used
the filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR?
It was they who were responsible for the
defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why
do you liars continue lying and blaming the
left for your failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes short
of the number needed to prevent opponents
using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to
derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster,
with the tally standing at 56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you
actaully read the link you would see that what
I posted came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part
voted as a block resulting in stopping the
bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster
does not change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among
those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to
vote his own bill down. He was not the only
RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the
last. You just can't live without thinking that
Fox has been lying can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet
a few individuals from another party who vote
against a bill are ones who are responsible for
stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are | | | |
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
