Society Issues Talk Society Issues Talk    FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next          Society Issues Talk Forum Index -> Liberalism View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message nobody Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:53 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:51:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: Quote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:l41k6455qve819tr1n4rs3copa6nght32s@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:12:58 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:6sqi64p6k76csa7gqeuk0jhheesp8vnbrn@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:18:30 -0600, Nicklas@Click.com wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:34:32 -0400, nobody nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't. Show us that there is not, you dumb asshole. I've already provided the cite that supports my position. I believe I was responding to the claim of the libs that the oil companies are sitting on land that contains oil and should be drilled for before any additional leases are granted. Can you support the claim or not? There is plenty of oil in many places in the world. There is no shortage of it. You are incapable of thinking for yourself and believe that in the short time Bush has held office all of a sudden there is none left. Do you need a cite to show you what a fool you are? That is already obvious. Can you answer the question or not? Dodging is so typical of the leftie loon. You are the one that has been dodging my question moron, not the other way around. When you answer mine I will answer yours to stupid tard. Read further back in the thread and comprehend that A: I asked the first question that you dodged and B: I've already cited my position. Quote: Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor nobody Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:54 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: Quote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman" jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans voted to block drilling. Waahahahahahahaa................... Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling. Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving them any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have? Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres or it is cost prohibitive to get it? http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories "Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback. Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't. You seem long on whines, short on cites. It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your own and need someone to tell you how to think. You need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of reality. Of course you are fool enough to think that I agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for economically or not? It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you ever done any researching for yourself or have you only relied on others to tell you what to think? I would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one clues about the oil available in Russia and other parts of the world. I can provide you with links but I want you to show me that you know more than what Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I showed you anyway. Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with the claim that land that is already leased has oil waiting for the drilling and this is why more land should not be leased for drilling. Care to try again? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor nobody Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:57 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:14:18 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: Quote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:jb1k64dfbhjfq7ajsgbqp45d6k8ov1dfcv@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:16:26 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:25592a3c-483e-4286-9840-e5b1ab55c7fd@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com On Jun 30, 1:25 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:a7hh6419jdp8emp3vbm3b2c0omevdktcfl@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. So so tell why the republicans voted to block the bill. If they didn't it would have passed. "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No'." All you RightTards do is bitch about the democrats that vote against drilling but can't even explain why it is your own party that is succeeding in the actual block. When morons like you can find a bill where every republican votes for it then you might have something to cry about. Until you can get your own party of obstruction under control then you are nothing more than a fool if you complain. They promised to bring it up again but never did. The promised to bring it up again but never did. The right is just as guilty of blocking drilling bills as the left. Explain why the majority of the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drillling. If they were voting for drilling it would pass regardless of how the repubs are voting. You really have a problem with comprehension don't you. You are just to stupid to be able to provide and answer as to why republicans have voted to block oil drilling so you place all the blame on the left. Drilling will do nothing to lower prices and no matter what you will never be able to show why the right has been doing the blocking. You are just totally clueless. Certainly doing absolutely nothing but finger point (as the Dems are doing) will not lower prices. You are an idiot. It is you RightTards that are blaming the left for voting down drilling. I am countering with proof that both are doing the same thing but so far not one tard like you is able to prove me wrong. The cost of oil is not currently based on supply and demand The Republicans are blaming the oil companies for "excessive profits" like the Dems are? What is the Dem plan to lower energy costs? Be specific, precise and cite (give it a try, you'll like it). Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor cmdr buzz corey Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:55 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: Quote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. You will always remain a stupid tard. It says: "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' ". Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the last. You just can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying can you tard? Right after you explain how a party voting as a block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet a few individuals from another party who vote against a bill are ones who are responsible for stopping that bill. Man you are one stupid tard. Man, you are a complete waste of time... No fool. You are running from the original question. You are unable to answer so you continue to remain ignorant. Why won't you answer the question of why the simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently voting against drilling? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor nobody Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: Quote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. You will always remain a stupid tard. It says: "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' ". Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the last. You just can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying can you tard? Right after you explain how a party voting as a block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet a few individuals from another party who vote against a bill are ones who are responsible for stopping that bill. Man you are one stupid tard. Man, you are a complete waste of time... No fool. You are running from the original question. You are unable to answer so you continue to remain ignorant. Why won't you answer the question of why the simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently voting against drilling? No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans voted to block oil drilling for so long. I have been asking this for some time and haven't found one tard that can answer. You are just one more clueless simpleton so you run like the pussy you are. This is the kind of logic one would expect from a loon who says that a party who votes as a block against Anwar is not responsible for blocking the drilling, but the party who had a few individuals vote against drilling is the party responsible for blocking the bill. As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a complete waste of time... > Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Republican Liar Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 <ejordan@nhdallas.com> wrote in message news:4030b7a3-181a-4ae7-bb61-ebc78966bfe1@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com Quote: On Jul 1, 3:16 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. You will always remain a stupid tard. It says: "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' ". Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the last. You just can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying can you tard? Right after you explain how a party voting as a block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet a few individuals from another party who vote against a bill are ones who are responsible for stopping that bill. Man you are one stupid tard. Man, you are a complete waste of time... No fool. You are running from the original question. You are unable to answer so you continue to remain ignorant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this thread is a great example of why I am now an extreme independent. first off, most of the posts seem to have been written by people to young to remember the last oil crisis. the same solutions were proposed by both parties before the 1980 election. after the election nothing got done, no new nuke plant, no new oil wells, no green energy. second gas prices in CA have little to do w/ the left wing and alot to do with the cost of *trying* to clean up air quality on the unique land mass upon which most people in CA live on ... they have a natural *smog* problem. third the only options presented are right wing drill and left wing are rhetoric, drill or don't drill for decades huge pools of only have sat untapped in known and drillable areas but not been developed ... why? because it cost lots of money to put a sizeable field into production and big oil would raise their asset value (stock price) by proving new fields and without laying out the massive investment needed to turn reserves into production ... do the research increases in production come from increasing production on long producing wells and small producers who can't play the games big oil can, big oil rarely puts new fields into production and files laws suits against small operators seeking to drill production wells in their neighborhood just this week a small oil company worked out an offshore deal with so called environmentalists in SoCal ... the only law suites threatened were from big oil who claim the small oil company is directional drilling into fields that are too expensive for them (big oil) to produce on keep this in mind - there are enough fossil fuel reserves in the US in the current mineral rights of fortune 100 companies to more than supply all US energy needs and export some too. the big boys can drill if they want to legislation can make big oil put fields into production, produce on the leases or surrender them, is your party demanding such laws? why not? if we simply offer new oil leases to big oil some politicians will claim issue solved ... in reality big oil will win the high bids then drill proving wells ... run up their stock and keep putting just enough production flowing to keep prices up ... think about it the only way oil prices came down in the 1980s was when Reagan talked the Saudis into increasing production in exchange for what may be the world's 2nd best military force if we don't drill (meaning don't sale new oil leases) ... we're stuck even if we increase production of non-fossil energy by a factor of 10 note the rnc says do all the above, beginning with new oil leases note the dnc says do all the above, except new oil leases who is served by this gridlock ... big oil, who loses ... our disposalable income if we don't figure a way to increase "energy" production, fossil and non-fossil, by empowering small & mid size firms to produce such, we're sunk ... the difficulty of this obvious solution is no future 1000 companies are currently investing in the politics of "drill" or "no-drill". note the politics of the dnc & the rnc are not the solution - they are the problem this same problem exists at many levels, the dnc tax the rich, the rnc don't tax the rich ... the rnc has preached for years cutting taxes for thr rich will create more investment and more jobs ... calling on Adam Smith's "wealth of nation's" as an intellectual foundation for classical economics ... excuse me but there was no such thing as big business in Adam's day, for example - please domonstrate how buying Exon or Walmart or Ford stock will create more jobs. The problem with such a policy is that it drives money into big cap stocks not into fast growing small or mid size companies (note the DOW goes up fatser than small stocks under the rnc rule) the dnc by contrasts are avdocating Keynes economics (if they admit it or not) which suggests during hard times r amp up govenrment spending ... under normal circumstances this can work, it did in the 1930s, the diferrence - we weren't $10 trillion in debt when FDR came to office solution get some 30 year 5% seed money in the hands of up and coming movers and shakers ... the big bucks behind the dnc & rnc are terrified of such because that would put a big dent in their respective power bases again big biz lobbies for rich tax cuts ... unions for no rich tax cuts ... no other political solution offered by either wing because there are no big dawg political machines fighting for a real solution in short neither party is offering real solutions - just BS rhetoric now we face the the worst long term financial challenges in US history = most of us can't afford a new house to too much regulation AND the debt generated by the S&L scandal and the sub prime scandal (both scandals caused by the refusal of Bush I and Dubya tp enforce the law) and worse, due to ridulous foriegn poicly by all 3 presidents since Reagan we can't cut our military budget, and military spending is the only sizeable big ticket which is even negotiable ... debt service, SS, and MC are all long term deals which the US government agreed too long ago - it may come down to ... depression ****** sadly what's most likely is a swing to the radical left because the swing to the right which began back in 1980 has ended with the likes of this Bush administration, the most far right bunch since Hoover that swing to the left will likey bring on faggot weddings and over regulation ... oh well ... is that any worse than war profiteering neo nazis? we are close to telling seniors we have no healh care for ya and we can't send ya SS check and your savings are tied up in a house and stocks which are worth less than you paid for them ... or telling T- bond holders we'll pay you some of what we promised sooner or later ... military vulnerablity and or bankruptcy seem likely if we leave things to the lame ass right wing or the lame ass left wing maybe one day we will start a viable 3rd party of non-brain washed folks who love their country more than their parties ... unforetunately most people have lost their ability to think for themselves and are willing to accept brand R or brand D So, all in all you are scared of "faggot weddings". Nothing new here Tard. Have a nice day. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor nobody Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:44:03 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: Quote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman" jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com wrote in message news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans voted to block drilling. Waahahahahahahaa................... Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling. Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving them any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have? Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres or it is cost prohibitive to get it? http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories "Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback. Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't. You seem long on whines, short on cites. It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your own and need someone to tell you how to think. You need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of reality. Of course you are fool enough to think that I agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for economically or not? It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you ever done any researching for yourself or have you only relied on others to tell you what to think? I would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one clues about the oil available in Russia and other parts of the world. I can provide you with links but I want you to show me that you know more than what Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I showed you anyway. Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with the claim that land that is already leased has oil waiting for the drilling and this is why more land should not be leased for drilling. Care to try again? Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay attention? I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you have difficulty following a thread since the subject of the oil leases is what I've been talking about. Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual topic... Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Republican Liar Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com Quote: On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. You will always remain a stupid tard. It says: "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' ". Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the last. You just can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying can you tard? Right after you explain how a party voting as a block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet a few individuals from another party who vote against a bill are ones who are responsible for stopping that bill. Man you are one stupid tard. Man, you are a complete waste of time... No fool. You are running from the original question. You are unable to answer so you continue to remain ignorant. Why won't you answer the question of why the simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently voting against drilling? No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans voted to block oil drilling for so long. I have been asking this for some time and haven't found one tard that can answer. You are just one more clueless simpleton so you run like the pussy you are. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Republican Liar Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com Quote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman" jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com wrote in message news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans voted to block drilling. Waahahahahahahaa................... Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling. Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving them any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have? Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres or it is cost prohibitive to get it? http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories "Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback. Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't. You seem long on whines, short on cites. It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your own and need someone to tell you how to think. You need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of reality. Of course you are fool enough to think that I agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for economically or not? It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you ever done any researching for yourself or have you only relied on others to tell you what to think? I would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one clues about the oil available in Russia and other parts of the world. I can provide you with links but I want you to show me that you know more than what Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I showed you anyway. Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with the claim that land that is already leased has oil waiting for the drilling and this is why more land should not be leased for drilling. Care to try again? Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay attention? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Republican Liar Guest Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:mddl64tel7cov5kiv097do1v7th00pr0je@4ax.com Quote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:14:18 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:jb1k64dfbhjfq7ajsgbqp45d6k8ov1dfcv@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:16:26 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:25592a3c-483e-4286-9840-e5b1ab55c7fd@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com On Jun 30, 1:25 pm, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:a7hh6419jdp8emp3vbm3b2c0omevdktcfl@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. So so tell why the republicans voted to block the bill. If they didn't it would have passed. "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No'." All you RightTards do is bitch about the democrats that vote against drilling but can't even explain why it is your own party that is succeeding in the actual block. When morons like you can find a bill where every republican votes for it then you might have something to cry about. Until you can get your own party of obstruction under control then you are nothing more than a fool if you complain. They promised to bring it up again but never did. The promised to bring it up again but never did. The right is just as guilty of blocking drilling bills as the left. Explain why the majority of the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drillling. If they were voting for drilling it would pass regardless of how the repubs are voting. You really have a problem with comprehension don't you. You are just to stupid to be able to provide and answer as to why republicans have voted to block oil drilling so you place all the blame on the left. Drilling will do nothing to lower prices and no matter what you will never be able to show why the right has been doing the blocking. You are just totally clueless. Certainly doing absolutely nothing but finger point (as the Dems are doing) will not lower prices. You are an idiot. It is you RightTards that are blaming the left for voting down drilling. I am countering with proof that both are doing the same thing but so far not one tard like you is able to prove me wrong. The cost of oil is not currently based on supply and demand The Republicans are blaming the oil companies for "excessive profits" like the Dems are? What is the Dem plan to lower energy costs? Be specific, precise and cite (give it a try, you'll like it). Is that what you read in the above post by me? Let me say it again. Both the left and the right are voting to block drilling while the right blames it all on the left. I never claimed that the left had a plan to lower costs. The costs will never go down more than a small amount over time. There is no need to drill for more oil because that will not lower prices. There is plenty of world oil that can be supplied to the end user. The speculators need to pay higher taxes on their profits from investments. More deals need to be made with OPEC to supply more oil. The Bush war for oil has caused the rise in prices by cutting the flow from Iraq but this was the plan all along. The right screws America yet again. Nothing new here. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Republican Liar Guest Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:2qhm64thl8n9532m4kn7rtavsg06jebot1@4ax.com Quote: On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:44:03 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman" jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com wrote in message news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans voted to block drilling. Waahahahahahahaa................... Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling. Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving them any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have? Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres or it is cost prohibitive to get it? http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories "Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback. Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't. You seem long on whines, short on cites. It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard like you is. You are incapable of thinking on your own and need someone to tell you how to think. You need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of reality. Of course you are fool enough to think that I agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for economically or not? It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in SA. Then they agreed to provide a little more. Much more oil can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you ever done any researching for yourself or have you only relied on others to tell you what to think? I would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one clues about the oil available in Russia and other parts of the world. I can provide you with links but I want you to show me that you know more than what Fox or Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an ignorant troll and wouldn't believe anything I showed you anyway. Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with the claim that land that is already leased has oil waiting for the drilling and this is why more land should not be leased for drilling. Care to try again? Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay attention? I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you have difficulty following a thread since the subject of the oil leases is what I've been talking about. Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual topic... You are retarded. If you had been following the thread you would see what a total fool you are. The thread is not about oil leases moron, it is about blocking drilling. You get more stupid with every post. Try again fool. You can't weasel out now. Lying only makes you look even more of an ignoramace. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Republican Liar Guest Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:31 am    Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 "nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com Quote: On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar" Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar" Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: "cmdr buzz corey" cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in message news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston" Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote: jose wrote: On Jun 26, 2:14 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote: Thansk you fucking democraps! Oil jumps above $140 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1 Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy... Mission accomplished!! Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas prices high through November. The next time you fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons. So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by November? I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today. So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they are. So let's start now for the future. If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain. If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more ignorant than anyone ever imagined. Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses and the WhiteHouse for so long? You sure are stupid retard aren't you? Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block Anwar. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done? From your own cite: Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote. The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44. More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to portray. Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would see that what I posted came directly from it. Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not change that fact. You will always remain a stupid tard. It says: "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' ". Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the last. You just can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying can you tard? Right after you explain how a party voting as a block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet a few individuals from another party who vote against a bill are ones who are responsible for stopping that bill. Man you are one stupid tard. Man, you are a complete waste of time... No fool. You are running from the original question. You are unable to answer so you continue to remain ignorant. Why won't you answer the question of why the simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently voting against drilling? No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans voted to block oil drilling for so long.