| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nobody
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:30 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
 |
|
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:15:58 -0700 (PDT),
TypicalWhitePerson@mailcity.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Jul 3, 1:56 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:25a458aa-3ca6-4be8-87fb-a5ea7f259eb5@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
On Jul 3, 2:25 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
messagenews:1ffc899d-b051-4cd8-9305-6a55268b5cc5@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 6:30 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
Wahahaha........You made a detour? You are a bit
slow aren't you?
So please explain why the simple-minded dummycrats in
Congress are voting against drilling.
Explain why the right has been voting to block
drilling. Why did Frist vote again his own bill? If he
had joined with other republicans and didn't vote to
block drilling the price of oil wouldn't be so high
right now. Why have the republicans been so successful
in causing oil prices to rise? I have been asking this
for some time. By avoiding my question only makes you
look entirely stupid. The right is directly responsible
for the high oil prices. Just one more screw. No wonder
America is calling for you fools to be replaced.
Explain why the current simple-minded dummycrats are
voting to block drilling. By avoiding my question you
make yourself look as stupid as you really are. Have you
worked hard in your life to become this stupid or does it
come naturally?
No jackass. I asked why the right has been voting to block drilling and has
succeeded since Bush took office. By you avoiding the question I asked first
you are the one that is cowardly running for the issue. You RightTards have
always been running so nothing new here. The right is the party of lies and
obstruction. You personally are a lowlife coward.
It is the simpe-minded dummycraps that are voting against drilling.
|
You can't argue with someone living in his own fantasy world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:49 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:fonq64p02hr10retqfm8t8gpmt5a63586s@4ax.com
| Quote: |
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:27:59 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:b4bp64l0jpvvt43s0cvop8socuo0pda20c@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:30:09 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:il1o64lkadgqf4sdq67oq3c79ah668i50v@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:28:46 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2qhm64thl8n9532m4kn7rtavsg06jebot1@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:44:03 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a3nhdv0ggq6fobabj4@4ax.com
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:05:38 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:071k6492v1mm1malqf4d6ipfd8e02sf9d4@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:07 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:puoi64doo47rddjpd39dub4kd03ea9mt0t@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:07:22 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg4d2hjc8gdk48svrp2@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:54:20 -0500, "Bugman"
jmposing@hotmail.com> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24-aa44-7eb9ce4fbfea@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Now........If you have any balls at all
please explain why republicans voted to
block drilling.
Waahahahahahahaa...................
Now if you have any brains, (obviously you
don't ) please explain why the simple
minded dummycrats are voting to block
drilling.
Big oil has leases on 68 million acres.
Democrats are against giving them any MORE.
Why aren't they developing what they already
have?
Perhaps because there's not oil on those
acres or it is cost prohibitive to get it?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories
"Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback.
Perhaps you can show us using the provided
cite or any other legitimate cite that there
is tons of oil on the land of those leases
and the oil companies could economically
drill for it but aren't. You seem long on
whines, short on cites.
It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard
like you is. You are incapable of thinking on
your own and need someone to tell you how to
think. You need Bush the oil man to tell you
his side of reality.
Of course you are fool enough to think that I
agree with Bush too. Can you provide a cite that
the land has oil on it and it can be drilled for
economically or not?
It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide
more oil. Bush was turned down by his friends in
SA. Then they agreed to provide a little more.
Much more oil can be output by OPEC if they
wanted to. Have you ever done any researching for
yourself or have you only relied on others to
tell you what to think? I would say that you are
very ignorant and haven't one clues about the oil
available in Russia and other parts of the world.
I can provide you with links but I want you to
show me that you know more than what Fox or Rush
is telling you. Maybe you are just an ignorant
troll and wouldn't believe anything I showed you
anyway.
Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do
with the claim that land that is already leased
has oil waiting for the drilling and this is why
more land should not be leased for drilling.
Care to try again?
Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land
already leased has any oil on it. Do you care to pay
attention?
I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you
have difficulty following a thread since the subject
of the oil leases is what I've been talking about.
Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual
topic...
You are retarded. If you had been following the
thread you would see what a total fool you are. The
thread is not about oil leases moron, it is about
blocking drilling.
Really? Perhaps you should have explained that when
the subject of leases was introduced into the thread
in message 17 of the thread.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/a3652e91ff772420?dmode=source
It looks like you need many things explained to you if
you expect me to explain something I never commented on.
Pay attention moron.
Then why did you respond in:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/06d9d69ab68251c4?dmode=source
"Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are
against giving them
any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already
have?"
Again moron, that is not anything I posted fool. You
must like making an ass out of yourself.
I didn't say you did "moron". This was part of a
conversation *you* insuated yourself in and got more
high and mighty with each post. You are far more
clueless than I gave you credit for.
I was conversing with him when you insinuated yourself
into the discussion. If you don't believe the subject
of leases for oil is relevant to the discussion, then
why on earth have you responded to me when it's clear
that's the discussion I was engaged in?
Wahahaha......IOW you took over the thread and demand I
have no right to comment. You make a bigger ass out of
yourself with every line you post. You are retarded.
I did no such thing. I've already cited where the
detour took place and it wasn't by me. In short, get a
clue, get a life, learn to comprehend, and grow the
heck up.
Man you are one stupid tard. You are the one that has no
clue moron. You definitely have your head screwed on a
bit twisted. Try reading what you post and see what a
fool you become in such short time. You attempt a
"detour" because you made an ass out of yourself.
As I demonstrated with an acutal cite (you haven't been
real good with that), I didn't detour. I responded to
someone who had *already* detoured.
The hysterical part of all this is that you're completely
clueless and accuse everyone else of being "stupid
tards". What an interesting little world you live in.
|
You are not living on the real world fool. You are completely unable to
respond so you run. Cowardice noted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:htnq649061v64e7i24h5vhq3n6uj2emnpe@4ax.com
| Quote: |
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:38:12 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:5ibp6413n48kopst6c2qvonqiha1l16ue6@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:32:23 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Repug@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com
wrote in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23
-0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives:
Liberals wet their Panties" <anti
gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney
are high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to
their advantage to keep gas prices
high through November. The next
time you fill up your tank thank
and bless Pelosi and her herd of
Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling
bring down the price of gasoline by
November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that
oil today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the
price down by November or anytime
soon, and it may not bring it down in
the future as oil will be more and
more in demand, but if we had started
drilling 10 years ago, that oil would
be on-line today and prices might not
be as high as they are. So let's start
now for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp,
get the six year old next door to read
it to you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies
and destroyed the economy in the process
there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You
repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you
think this is all about oil suddenly
disappearing and you are more ignorant
than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil
drilling much more recently then
Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR
when they had complete control of both
houses and the WhiteHouse for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used
the filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block
ANWR? It was they who were responsible for
the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats.
Why do you liars continue lying and
blaming the left for your failures to get
things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes
short of the number needed to prevent
opponents using a filibuster - or delaying
tactic - to derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led
filibuster, with the tally standing at
56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon.
If the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you
actaully read the link you would see that
what I posted came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most
part voted as a block resulting in stopping
the bill. A few Republicans joining the
filibuster does not change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among
those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to
vote his own bill down. He was not the only
RightTard to vote against it and he won't be
the last. You just can't live without thinking
that Fox has been lying can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill,
yet a few individuals from another party who
vote against a bill are ones who are
responsible for stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original
question. You are unable to answer so you
continue to remain ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the
republicans voted to block oil drilling for so
long. I have been asking this for some time and
haven't found one tard that can answer. You are
just one more clueless simpleton so you run like
the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a
loon who says that a party who votes as a block
against Anwar is not responsible for blocking the
drilling, but the party who had a few individuals
vote against drilling is the party responsible for
blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a
complete waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment
on the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places
so you again try to weasel. Nothing new for you
Tards. The right has successfully blocked oil
drilling for decades. Deal with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the
RightTard.
I've not run from anything. You've just proven yourself
unable to comprehend anything that doesn't fit your
thinking (such as blaming a minority who voted against a
bill for the failure of the bill but not the majority
that voted as a block against it).
The bill failed because it was voted down by the majority
party that proposed it. If the right had not voted it
down it would have beaten any filibuster if it occurred.
You sure are lame. Try again to answer why the
republicans voted against their own bill. You think you
have a point by blaming the left when the right is
guilty. You are a stupid one aren't you? Maybe if you did
some actual reading instead of listening to Fox you might
actually get an education. The republicans have been
blocking oil drilling since Bush took office. If that
were not the case the drilling would have started long
ago and there would be no $4. plus per gallon of gas. The
left votes to block drilling in ANWR because it will do
nothing to lower the price of oil.
One can't reason with an idiot who holds a whole party
responsible for the failure of a bill because a few of
that party voted against it but seems to have no problem
that the minority party voted as block against it and
filibustered it.
Now, moron, if you have any real questions feel free to
ask before you repeat the lies told to you by Fox and the
right-wing mindless troll that post on these groups.
You tards must really be pissed that the government will
be occupied by liberals from now on. LOL
If the liberals who mayl "occupy" the government
demonstrate the same basic lack of logic and thought that
you have, this country is in some serious trouble.
I'll waste no more time with you...
plonk
|
Surrender accepted fool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:47 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Jul 2, 7:32 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote
in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400,
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
their Panties" <anti gun liberal
k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are
high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to their
advantage to keep gas prices high
through November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and bless
Pelosi and her herd of Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling bring
down the price of gasoline by November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that oil
today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the price
down by November or anytime soon, and it
may not bring it down in the future as oil
will be more and more in demand, but if we
had started drilling 10 years ago, that oil
would be on-line today and prices might not
be as high as they are. So let's start now
for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to grasp, get
the six year old next door to read it to
you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies and
destroyed the economy in the process there
wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure
are a stupid bunch if you think this is all
about oil suddenly disappearing and you are
more ignorant than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil drilling
much more recently then Clinton? Why didn't
the right open ANWR when they had complete
control of both houses and the WhiteHouse
for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the
filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It
was they who were responsible for the defeat of
the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars
continue lying and blaming the left for your
failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of
the number needed to prevent opponents using a
filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the
vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led filibuster,
with the tally standing at 56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully
read the link you would see that what I posted
came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part
voted as a block resulting in stopping the bill.
A few Republicans joining the filibuster does not
change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those
to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote
his own bill down. He was not the only RightTard to
vote against it and he won't be the last. You just
can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying
can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill, yet
a few individuals from another party who vote
against a bill are ones who are responsible for
stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original question.
You are unable to answer so you continue to remain
ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans
voted to block oil drilling for so long. I have been
asking this for some time and haven't found one tard
that can answer. You are just one more clueless
simpleton so you run like the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a loon
who says that a party who votes as a block against Anwar
is not responsible for blocking the drilling, but the
party who had a few individuals vote against drilling is
the party responsible for blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a complete
waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment on
the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places so you
again try to weasel. Nothing new for you Tards. The right
has successfully blocked oil drilling for decades. Deal
with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the RightTard.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
I find it interesting you both ignored my post - but then I guess that
is what ignorant people do
have neither of you noticed there are no oil shortages, no gas
rationing, ... just demanding rising faster than supply and
instability in the mid east
by the way, there is more than enough US reserves in the hands of big
oil to amp up production, if they wanted to ... which is why Treasury
Sec Polson <sp?> made a few noises about "greater visabilty into oil
company reserves"
any idea why Reagan was able to cut a deal with SA to ramp up
production?
do either of you know why the US House and Senate banned offshore
drilling in 1982? and why Reagan signed the deal?
why wasn't Bush able to cut deal? but then again did he really try?
while you guys trip off fox or msnbc ... and argue about lame ass
rhetoric ... let me explain to you what's gonna happen:
about this time next year our new pres will bring an economic advisor,
a political advisor, they will be joined by Nancy P, and Harry R will
be there, so will their gop counter parts, and also there will be
several big oil executives ... a deal will be cut and oil prices will
come down just enough to get everyone in the room what they want -
MORE power and or money
the rest of the world will bitch ... some will win - some will
lose ... but they have to comply because they have neither the guns
nor the money to do anything but bow down
the deal will have nothing to do with which party wins the WH - but
the spin will
do neither of you realize big oil buys politicians all over the
planet, starts wars, owns hurds of lawyers and thugs ... as SOP and
has for the last 150 years ... this type of shit is what they do
that's the way it is - have you noticed only small oil producers and
new bees like Russia (the non-integrated little guys) have expanded
production?
hold on to any small oil & gas stocks ,,, never mind you're both
probably too ____ to have any money and too ___ to have invested in
the obvious when Bush slinked into the WH
the one thing the powers that be can't do is stop wind energy ... it
is too cheap and clean to stop ... bio & nuke & clean coal are too
capital intensive and fat cats won't lay out enough cash to make it
work becuse they know there is plenty of go juice in the ground
you have been conned by both sides, right & left, while big oil
drilled you - they are big business, monster big - they'll back off or
risk taking down chunks of the banking system
the above is a best case senario - you see the world economy is a
complex non-linear system - they may have gone too far this time ...
armagedon may have already started ... can you survive it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
<ejordan@nhdallas.com> wrote in message
news:f7343fb0-c86c-4127-a5b4-759b1b4aff4d@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
| Quote: |
On Jul 2, 7:32 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com
wrote in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23
-0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives:
Liberals wet their Panties" <anti
gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney
are high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to
their advantage to keep gas prices
high through November. The next
time you fill up your tank thank
and bless Pelosi and her herd of
Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling
bring down the price of gasoline by
November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that
oil today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the
price down by November or anytime
soon, and it may not bring it down in
the future as oil will be more and
more in demand, but if we had started
drilling 10 years ago, that oil would
be on-line today and prices might not
be as high as they are. So let's start
now for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to
grasp, get the six year old next door
to read it to you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies
and destroyed the economy in the process
there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You
repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you
think this is all about oil suddenly
disappearing and you are more ignorant
than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil
drilling much more recently then
Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR
when they had complete control of both
houses and the WhiteHouse for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems
used the filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block
ANWR? It was they who were responsible for
the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats.
Why do you liars continue lying and
blaming the left for your failures to get
things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes
short of the number needed to prevent
opponents using a filibuster - or delaying
tactic - to derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led
filibuster, with the tally standing at
56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you
actaully read the link you would see that
what I posted came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most
part voted as a block resulting in stopping
the bill. A few Republicans joining the
filibuster does not change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among
those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to
vote his own bill down. He was not the only
RightTard to vote against it and he won't be
the last. You just can't live without thinking
that Fox has been lying can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill,
yet a few individuals from another party who
vote against a bill are ones who are
responsible for stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original
question. You are unable to answer so you
continue to remain ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the
republicans voted to block oil drilling for so
long. I have been asking this for some time and
haven't found one tard that can answer. You are
just one more clueless simpleton so you run like
the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a
loon who says that a party who votes as a block
against Anwar is not responsible for blocking the
drilling, but the party who had a few individuals
vote against drilling is the party responsible for
blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a
complete waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment
on the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places
so you again try to weasel. Nothing new for you
Tards. The right has successfully blocked oil
drilling for decades. Deal with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the
RightTard.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I find it interesting you both ignored my post - but then
I guess that
is what ignorant people do.
|
I didn't ignore your post. It wasn't worth any more of a comment then the
one I offered. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:56 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
On Jul 4, 3:14 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
| Quote: |
ejor...@nhdallas.com> wrote in message
news:f7343fb0-c86c-4127-a5b4-759b1b4aff4d@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 7:32 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com
wrote in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com> wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23
-0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives:
Liberals wet their Panties" <anti
gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney
are high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The
Democrats believe it will be to
their advantage to keep gas prices
high through November. The next
time you fill up your tank thank
and bless Pelosi and her herd of
Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling
bring down the price of gasoline by
November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and
repug liar can understand. If President
Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded
dummycrat, had not vetoed the ANWR
proposal in 1995, we would have that
oil today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the
price down by November or anytime
soon, and it may not bring it down in
the future as oil will be more and
more in demand, but if we had started
drilling 10 years ago, that oil would
be on-line today and prices might not
be as high as they are. So let's start
now for the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to
grasp, get the six year old next door
to read it to you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over lies
and destroyed the economy in the process
there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You
repugs sure are a stupid bunch if you
think this is all about oil suddenly
disappearing and you are more ignorant
than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil
drilling much more recently then
Clinton? Why didn't the right open ANWR
when they had complete control of both
houses and the WhiteHouse for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems
used the filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block
ANWR? It was they who were responsible for
the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats.
Why do you liars continue lying and
blaming the left for your failures to get
things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes
short of the number needed to prevent
opponents using a filibuster - or delaying
tactic - to derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes
needed to avoid the Democrat-led
filibuster, with the tally standing at
56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If
the Dems had not led the filibuster, the
measure would have passed. The Dems blocked
the drilling by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you
actaully read the link you would see that
what I posted came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most
part voted as a block resulting in stopping
the bill. A few Republicans joining the
filibuster does not change that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among
those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to
vote his own bill down. He was not the only
RightTard to vote against it and he won't be
the last. You just can't live without thinking
that Fox has been lying can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting as a
block is not responsible for stopping a bill,
yet a few individuals from another party who
vote against a bill are ones who are
responsible for stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original
question. You are unable to answer so you
continue to remain ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are currently
voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the
republicans voted to block oil drilling for so
long. I have been asking this for some time and
haven't found one tard that can answer. You are
just one more clueless simpleton so you run like
the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a
loon who says that a party who votes as a block
against Anwar is not responsible for blocking the
drilling, but the party who had a few individuals
vote against drilling is the party responsible for
blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a
complete waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment
on the right blocking drilling ANWR and other places
so you again try to weasel. Nothing new for you
Tards. The right has successfully blocked oil
drilling for decades. Deal with it fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the
RightTard.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I find it interesting you both ignored my post - but then
I guess that
is what ignorant people do.
I didn't ignore your post. It wasn't worth any more of a comment then the
one I offered.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
do you really feel the exchamge between "nobody" and "republican liar"
is remotely reflective of the real politics at work in the oil
business? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Republican Liar
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:03 am Post subject: Re: Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00 |
|
|
<ejordan@nhdallas.com> wrote in message
news:d72931ed-3352-49f9-8a91-cafc46acd76b@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
| Quote: |
On Jul 4, 3:14 am, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
ejor...@nhdallas.com> wrote in message
news:f7343fb0-c86c-4127-a5b4-759b1b4aff4d@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jul 2, 7:32 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:24:01 -0400, "Republican
Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com
wrote in message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422-bf53-95fcf7c660dc@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
On Jul 1, 2:16 pm, "Republican Liar"
Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjguqsreuf556a68kjve@4ax.com
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1f693lr62hd6gdu3lu@4ax.com
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9j5guqheb5g0j8teae@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in
message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91hai0nlafs6bscgg28@4ax.com
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400,
"Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc
wrote:
"cmdr buzz corey"
cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote
in message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8-9414-3c215ae37709@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Jun 27, 12:44 pm, "Lamont
Cranston"
Lamont.Crans...@penumbra.com
wrote:
jose wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:14 pm,
retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23
-0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives:
Liberals wet their Panties"
anti gun liberal
k...@dnc.org> wrote:
Thansk you fucking democraps!
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Those oil guys, Bush and
Cheney are high fiving each
other:http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy...
Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed.
The Democrats believe it will
be to their advantage to keep
gas prices high through
November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and
bless Pelosi and her herd of
Democrat morons.
So, how would voting for drilling
bring down the price of gasoline
by November?
I'll type this slowly so maybe you
and repug liar can understand. If
President Billyboy Clinton, a
simple-minded dummycrat, had not
vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995,
we would have that oil today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the
price down by November or anytime
soon, and it may not bring it down
in the future as oil will be more
and more in demand, but if we had
started drilling 10 years ago,
that oil would be on-line today
and prices might not be as high as
they are. So let's start now for
the future.
If that is still too hard for your
simple-minded dummycrat brain to
grasp, get the six year old next
door to read it to you and explain.
If Bush had not waged a war over
lies and destroyed the economy in
the process there wouldn't be an oil
crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid
bunch if you think this is all about
oil suddenly disappearing and you
are more ignorant than anyone ever
imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil
drilling much more recently then
Clinton? Why didn't the right open
ANWR when they had complete control
of both houses and the WhiteHouse
for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't
you?
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems
used the filibuster to block Anwar.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
But WHY did republicans vote to block
ANWR? It was they who were responsible
for the defeat of the bill. NOT the
democrats. Why do you liars continue
lying and blaming the left for your
failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes
short of the number needed to prevent
opponents using a filibuster - or
delaying tactic - to derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60
votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led
filibuster, with the tally standing at
56-44.
More attempted dishonesty by a lib
loon. If the Dems had not led the
filibuster, the measure would have
passed. The Dems blocked the drilling
by voting as a block, not the
Republicans as you've tried to
portray.
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you
actaully read the link you would see that
what I posted came directly from it.
Right, the cite says the Dems for the
most part voted as a block resulting in
stopping the bill. A few Republicans
joining the filibuster does not change
that fact.
You will always remain a stupid tard. It
says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was
among those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the
first to vote his own bill down. He was
not the only RightTard to vote against it
and he won't be the last. You just can't
live without thinking that Fox has been
lying can you tard?
Right after you explain how a party voting
as a block is not responsible for stopping
a bill, yet a few individuals from another
party who vote against a bill are ones who
are responsible for stopping that bill.
Man you are one stupid tard.
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
No fool. You are running from the original
question. You are unable to answer so you
continue to remain ignorant.
Why won't you answer the question of why the
simple-minded dummycrats in congress are
currently voting against drilling?
No moron. I have been asking why have the
republicans voted to block oil drilling for so
long. I have been asking this for some time and
haven't found one tard that can answer. You are
just one more clueless simpleton so you run like
the pussy you are.
This is the kind of logic one would expect from
a loon who says that a party who votes as a
block against Anwar is not responsible for
blocking the drilling, but the party who had a
few individuals vote against drilling is the
party responsible for blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a
complete waste of time...
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even
comment on the right blocking drilling ANWR and
other places so you again try to weasel. Nothing
new for you Tards. The right has successfully
blocked oil drilling for decades. Deal with it
fool.
It must be very interesting in your world....
You have no clue so you run. Nothing new from the
RightTard.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I find it interesting you both ignored my post - but
then I guess that
is what ignorant people do.
I didn't ignore your post. It wasn't worth any more of
a comment then the one I offered.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
do you really feel the exchamge between "nobody" and
"republican liar"
is remotely reflective of the real politics at work in
the oil
business?
|
Not in any way. "Nobody" has his head up his ass. All that has ever gone on
in 99% of these oil drill exchanges is "Blame the left" for the blocking of
drilling because it is all that comes Fox and Rush. The truth is there has
never been a serious pursuit of other sources of oil or alternatives. Both
parties have dropped the ball. The recent spike has caught everyone off
guard including the auto industries who should have known better. The
politics of big oil is conducted behind closed doors and undercover of the
ignorance of the public to know about what deals have been struck. It has
next to nothing to do with supply and demand. All the tards want to do is
think they have something by placing the blame of the left as if drilling
would actually do something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
147 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
