| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Server
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:56 pm Post subject: Will they prosecute Hillary?----NO KENNYLOON and didn't a D |
 |
|
| #### |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
The Vicar
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:56 pm Post subject: Re: Will they prosecute Hillary?----NO KENNYLOON and didn't |
|
|
<Click@Knicklas.com> wrote in message
news:rpksu2lvbe97bjredd4gnc8m9vpq2amncq@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:36:45 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
Yeah, a DECADE or so ago, you dumb fuck
Asked and ANSWERED.
Rightwing fuckwits couldn't come up with ANYTHING other
than a lame unproven allegation.
|
and that was after 100 million dollar investigation that proved there was
absolutely nothing to be found.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ken
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: Will they prosecute Hillary?----NO KENNYLOON and didn't |
|
|
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:36:45 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
Yeah, a DECADE or so ago, you dumb fuck
Asked and ANSWERED.
Rightwing fuckwits couldn't come up with ANYTHING other
than a lame unproven allegation.
(SNICKER)
|
Apparently you do not know how to read or reason. You might be one of
those who had trouble understanding the election ballot while voting as
well? So please put down your crayons and RE-READ the question. You
can't have it both ways. She is either a person with a very poor
memory, or she is a liar under oath. Which one???? And if it had been
answered long ago, she would be in jail like where they want to send Libby.
The hypocrisy of you liberals is breathtaking!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Mich
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject: Re: Will they prosecute Hillary??? |
|
|
"Ken" <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:hrqHh.41255$as2.30023@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| Quote: |
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
|
America don't give a shit, except for desperate Repugs trying hard to find
any excuse to hold on to power.
It's not working. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: Re: Will they prosecute Hillary?----NO KENNYLOON and didn't |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:11:16 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: |
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:36:45 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
Yeah, a DECADE or so ago, you dumb fuck
Asked and ANSWERED.
Rightwing fuckwits couldn't come up with ANYTHING other
than a lame unproven allegation.
(SNICKER)
Apparently you do not know how to read or reason.
|
It is "unreasonable" to conclude (after a decade) that
the Clinton's did ANYTHING wrong after $130 million +
was spent in the most massive, invasive, personal
investigation of two people in American history.
| Quote: |
You might be one of
those who had trouble understanding the election ballot while voting as
well?
|
YOU might be one of those idiot's, that after lapping
up the rightwing propaganda about "ballots" that, even
after seeing them reproduced, concluded that there
wasn't some confusing design.
| Quote: |
So please put down your crayons and RE-READ the question.
|
Sorry, but since it was written in scrawled crayon-like
intellect, it wasn't deciperable.
| Quote: |
You
can't have it both ways. She is either a person with a very poor
memory, or she is a liar under oath. Which one????
|
Ya stupid cluck
That sentence contains a fallacy claim. One must
accept a premise not proven by facts and evidence. NO
ONE has proven here memory was bad OR lied.
You're demanding someone accept that either, or both is
true WITHOUT Evidence. That's FALLACY argument.
| Quote: |
And if it had been
answered long ago, she would be in jail like where they want to send Libby.
|
It was ASKED AND ANSWERED over a decade ago.
It might also be of note to look at WHO is still
whining about this------about a handful of you dumb
cocksuckers who couldn't beat her.
| Quote: |
The hypocrisy of you liberals is breathtaking!!!!
|
To which we reply with a litany of LIARS, FELONS,
Unethical bastards, greedy fuckwits on YOUR side:
Nixon
Reagan
Ney
Cunningham
Gingrich
Delay
Livingston
Hutchinson
Chenoweth.
| Quote: |
==================================================================
President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1
McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946
.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ken
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:45 pm Post subject: Re: Will they prosecute Hillary?----NO KENNYLOON and didn't |
|
|
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:11:16 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:36:45 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
Yeah, a DECADE or so ago, you dumb fuck
Asked and ANSWERED.
Rightwing fuckwits couldn't come up with ANYTHING other
than a lame unproven allegation.
(SNICKER)
Apparently you do not know how to read or reason.
It is "unreasonable" to conclude (after a decade) that
the Clinton's did ANYTHING wrong after $130 million +
was spent in the most massive, invasive, personal
investigation of two people in American history.
You might be one of
those who had trouble understanding the election ballot while voting as
well?
YOU might be one of those idiot's, that after lapping
up the rightwing propaganda about "ballots" that, even
after seeing them reproduced, concluded that there
wasn't some confusing design.
So please put down your crayons and RE-READ the question.
Sorry, but since it was written in scrawled crayon-like
intellect, it wasn't deciperable.
You
can't have it both ways. She is either a person with a very poor
memory, or she is a liar under oath. Which one????
Ya stupid cluck
That sentence contains a fallacy claim. One must
accept a premise not proven by facts and evidence. NO
ONE has proven here memory was bad OR lied.
You're demanding someone accept that either, or both is
true WITHOUT Evidence. That's FALLACY argument.
And if it had been
answered long ago, she would be in jail like where they want to send Libby.
It was ASKED AND ANSWERED over a decade ago.
It might also be of note to look at WHO is still
whining about this------about a handful of you dumb
cocksuckers who couldn't beat her.
The hypocrisy of you liberals is breathtaking!!!!
To which we reply with a litany of LIARS, FELONS,
Unethical bastards, greedy fuckwits on YOUR side:
Nixon
Reagan
Ney
Cunningham
Gingrich
Delay
Livingston
Hutchinson
Chenoweth.
==================================================================
President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1
McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946
.
|
After reading your twisted explanation peppered with vulgarities, it is
apparent you forgot the most logical explanation for her faulty
memory/lying incident. "It all depends upon your definition of the
word, lying." Sort of catchy, don't you think? Perhaps Libby will use
it in his appeal??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:25 am Post subject: Re: Elizabeth Hassleback is an ignorant cunt |
|
|
On Mar 3, 1:13 pm, KRJ <krj...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
another left wing voice or reason...lol...the only reason I fear the
government is that it is used by people like you to enforce their pure
faith belief...and please try to understand your politics are no more
reasonable than any other religion...please stop before you hurt yourself
|
Another conservative imbecile. Some things need to be regulated,
dipshit. Like the water and air.
And only the supremely wealthy benefit from Corporate America gone
wild.
I hope your one of these moguls-- spewing that garbage- or you're just
another dupe of the American ruling class. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:28 am Post subject: Re: Elizabeth Hassleback is an ignorant cunt |
|
|
On Mar 3, 1:13 pm, KRJ <krj...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
another left wing voice or reason...lol...the only reason I fear the
government is that it is used by people like you to enforce their pure
faith belief...and please try to understand your politics are no more
reasonable than any other religion...please stop before you hurt yourself
|
Another conservative imbecile. Some things need to be regulated,
dipshit. Like the water and air.
And only the supremely wealthy benefit from Corporate America gone
wild.
I hope you are one of these moguls-- spewing that garbage. If not,
you're just
another dupe of the American ruling class. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:49 am Post subject: POOR KENNYLOON: Hates it when a dumb bastard is called exac |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:45:34 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: |
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:11:16 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:36:45 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
Yeah, a DECADE or so ago, you dumb fuck
Asked and ANSWERED.
Rightwing fuckwits couldn't come up with ANYTHING other
than a lame unproven allegation.
(SNICKER)
Apparently you do not know how to read or reason.
It is "unreasonable" to conclude (after a decade) that
the Clinton's did ANYTHING wrong after $130 million +
was spent in the most massive, invasive, personal
investigation of two people in American history.
You might be one of
those who had trouble understanding the election ballot while voting as
well?
YOU might be one of those idiot's, that after lapping
up the rightwing propaganda about "ballots" that, even
after seeing them reproduced, concluded that there
wasn't some confusing design.
So please put down your crayons and RE-READ the question.
Sorry, but since it was written in scrawled crayon-like
intellect, it wasn't deciperable.
You
can't have it both ways. She is either a person with a very poor
memory, or she is a liar under oath. Which one????
Ya stupid cluck
That sentence contains a fallacy claim. One must
accept a premise not proven by facts and evidence. NO
ONE has proven here memory was bad OR lied.
You're demanding someone accept that either, or both is
true WITHOUT Evidence. That's FALLACY argument.
And if it had been
answered long ago, she would be in jail like where they want to send Libby.
It was ASKED AND ANSWERED over a decade ago.
It might also be of note to look at WHO is still
whining about this------about a handful of you dumb
cocksuckers who couldn't beat her.
The hypocrisy of you liberals is breathtaking!!!!
To which we reply with a litany of LIARS, FELONS,
Unethical bastards, greedy fuckwits on YOUR side:
Nixon
Reagan
Ney
Cunningham
Gingrich
Delay
Livingston
Hutchinson
Chenoweth.
==================================================================
President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1
McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946
.
After reading your twisted explanation peppered with vulgarities, it is
apparent you forgot the most logical explanation for her faulty
memory/lying incident.
|
"Faulty memories" has NO known legal code as a broken
law.
LYING, and having it PROVEN (as in Libby's case) is.
There was well over $130 MILLION tax dollars spent
attempting to prove some law or act of the Clintons
that may have been broken
NOT ONE was ever discovered. Congressional
investigators turned up NOTHING
THREE (3) separate OIC'S Found NOTHING, KennyLoon.
| Quote: |
"It all depends upon your definition of the
word, lying."
|
The "Definition" of "words" IS what law is you stupid
fuck.
Do you not agree that ANYONE having a multi-million
dollar smear being waged should be able to "parse"
words in order to defend ones-self?
| Quote: |
===========================================================================
"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites
are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this
disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not
putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out
and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send
them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ken
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:18 am Post subject: Re: POOR KENNYLOON: Hates it when a dumb bastard is called |
|
|
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
| Quote: |
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:45:34 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:11:16 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Click@Knicklas.com wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:36:45 GMT, Ken
user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Questions surfaced about Hillary Clinton's work as a lawyer in Little
Rock's Rose Law Firm. Questioned under oath in 1996 about her work for
Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99 occasions that she was unable to recall
what she might have done. Was she lying or just has a bad memory??? If
it is the latter, do you still think she is qualified to be president???
America wants to know.
Yeah, a DECADE or so ago, you dumb fuck
Asked and ANSWERED.
Rightwing fuckwits couldn't come up with ANYTHING other
than a lame unproven allegation.
(SNICKER)
Apparently you do not know how to read or reason.
It is "unreasonable" to conclude (after a decade) that
the Clinton's did ANYTHING wrong after $130 million +
was spent in the most massive, invasive, personal
investigation of two people in American history.
You might be one of
those who had trouble understanding the election ballot while voting as
well?
YOU might be one of those idiot's, that after lapping
up the rightwing propaganda about "ballots" that, even
after seeing them reproduced, concluded that there
wasn't some confusing design.
So please put down your crayons and RE-READ the question.
Sorry, but since it was written in scrawled crayon-like
intellect, it wasn't deciperable.
You
can't have it both ways. She is either a person with a very poor
memory, or she is a liar under oath. Which one????
Ya stupid cluck
That sentence contains a fallacy claim. One must
accept a premise not proven by facts and evidence. NO
ONE has proven here memory was bad OR lied.
You're demanding someone accept that either, or both is
true WITHOUT Evidence. That's FALLACY argument.
And if it had been
answered long ago, she would be in jail like where they want to send Libby.
It was ASKED AND ANSWERED over a decade ago.
It might also be of note to look at WHO is still
whining about this------about a handful of you dumb
cocksuckers who couldn't beat her.
The hypocrisy of you liberals is breathtaking!!!!
To which we reply with a litany of LIARS, FELONS,
Unethical bastards, greedy fuckwits on YOUR side:
Nixon
Reagan
Ney
Cunningham
Gingrich
Delay
Livingston
Hutchinson
Chenoweth.
==================================================================
President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1
McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946
.
After reading your twisted explanation peppered with vulgarities, it is
apparent you forgot the most logical explanation for her faulty
memory/lying incident.
"Faulty memories" has NO known legal code as a broken
law.
LYING, and having it PROVEN (as in Libby's case) is.
There was well over $130 MILLION tax dollars spent
attempting to prove some law or act of the Clintons
that may have been broken
NOT ONE was ever discovered. Congressional
investigators turned up NOTHING
THREE (3) separate OIC'S Found NOTHING, KennyLoon.
"It all depends upon your definition of the
word, lying."
The "Definition" of "words" IS what law is you stupid
fuck.
Do you not agree that ANYONE having a multi-million
dollar smear being waged should be able to "parse"
words in order to defend ones-self?
|
By lying?????? NO!!!!
As for "Nothing" having come from the investigations, the governor of
Arkansas was convicted and removed from office, WJC lost his law
license, one of the Whitewater principals went to jail along with his
wife, and the people of this country learned what a liar both of the
Clintons were. I would hardly call that "Nothing." Oh yes, the
president was impeached. You really should move beyond coloring books
to newspapers and magazines!!
Maybe THIS is what Al Gore meant in his book, "An inconvenient truth?"
| Quote: |
===========================================================================
"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites
are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this
disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not
putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out
and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send
them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:25 pm Post subject: Re: POOR KENNYLOON: Hates it when a dumb bastard is called |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:18:50 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: |
Do you not agree that ANYONE having a multi-million
dollar smear being waged should be able to "parse"
words in order to defend ones-self?
By lying?????? NO!!!!
|
So then you don't support a lying, greedy sack of shit
like Reagan? He LIED (under oath) in the pointdexter
deposition---not once but dozens of times.
Are you prepared to call him a LYING SONOFABITCH?
| Quote: |
As for "Nothing" having come from the investigations, the governor of
Arkansas was convicted
|
Which has what to do with Clinton. ??
Are you suggesting that simply because both were
Americans---or Arkansans, that it put Clinton in an
"association" with him? Even you can't be that
stupid.
To date, only ONE (1) high ranking Clinton
administration officia was found to have committed
egregious enough "crimes" as to be charged----(Hubbel)
The rest---literall scores, were peripheral, unrelated
to, or in no way connected to Clinton or his
administration.
| Quote: |
and removed from office, WJC lost his law
license,
|
His License (not used) was suspended. It was suspended
because he CHOSE to not RE-WIN the Jones civil suit
(having already one without any defense). He CHOSE not
to RE-WIN the Jones Civil action because it would have
cost him 5-7 Times what a "settlement" would have.
"Settling" is a monetary decision. His denial of
having "sexual relations" was related to the LEGAL
TRUTH he told in his deposition denial.
It had NOTHING to do with whether or not him and
Lewinsky had "sex"----it was about LEGAL DEFINITIONS
and whether a defendant (in this case a paid smear job)
has the RIGHT to challenge "meanings of words"---which
Cliinton did.
| Quote: |
one of the Whitewater principals went to jail along with his
wife, and the people of this country learned what a liar both of the
Clintons were. I would hardly call that "Nothing." Oh yes, the
president was impeached. You really should move beyond coloring books
to newspapers and magazines!!
|
First of all, after THREE separate OIC's Concluded that
the Clintons had NOTHING to do with WhiteWater, that NO
credible evidence EVER existed to conclude THEY did
anything illegal, the matter (now) has been settled.
There was NO "there, there" in Whitewater. That was
PROVEN by FIsk, Starr, and finally the last refused to
even consider mentioning it again.
If you're saying that an Unlimited amount of money
spent by the world's GREATEST criminal investigation
agency could not find a SHRED of evidence to support
those SILLY claims you're STILL m aking, then you're a
dumb as I keep saying you are.
You're one of the3-4% who will never get over the FACT
that Clinton's conducted themselved MORE ETHICAL,
MORAL, and HONEST than Ronald Reagan who----
LIED MORE
Was MORE GREEDY
Subverted the constitution
Pandered to Wealth
And used our Nations resources to aggrandize his
worthless name
Thank GOD----that he finaly caused the rat-fuck to
drool and waste away so we could laugh at him.
| Quote: |
Maybe THIS is what Al Gore meant in his book, "An inconvenient truth?"
===========================================================================
"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites
are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this
disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not
putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out
and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send
them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Seawolf
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:41 am Post subject: Re: Missed Cheney - DAMN! |
|
|
"seon ferguson" <seon@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:45e66032$0$31105$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
| Quote: |
"Seawolf" <Seawolf82@sc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45e64c38$1$28158$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"seon ferguson" <seon@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:45e515f7$0$11551$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
"Seawolf" <Seawolf82@sc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45e4bf7b$1$5202$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
"Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in message
news:es1lqb$uui$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"LiberalsR-anti-American" <Libs Loathe Military@earthlink.net> wrote
in message news:45e45620$0$9441$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
WOW....Are you a liberal or a foreign savage? If you are American
you could be the posterboy for democrats and the people that hate
America.
....OR hate republiar, warmonger, and burner and crusher of kids for
profit Dick Cheney.
....OR be an ignorant fool, such as yourself.........must suck to be as
ignorant as you are, otherwise you'd see the irony of your
"argument"......LOL!
You'd think (well, you wouldn't) that eventually you "Bush is evil"
folks would get it...........till you do; keep posting, it makes me
laugh to watch you morons trying to dig yourselves out of
holes............
the only ignorant ones are the idiots who support Lord Bush.
Thanks for proving my point..........keep responding, idiot.
You're the one who believes in the lies and propaganda. You're the one who
believes we went into Iraq in 2003 to stop Saddam from making WMD's and
bring freedom and democracy to Iraq. You're the one who allows your
president to continue to tear apart the constitution. Oops I mean his
lordship. Cause anyone who dares speak out against him should be sent to
concentration camps like in communist china, right?
|
Nope. How about you make a rational argument next time?
Sorry it took so long to get back to you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
torresdD
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
torresdD
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
torresdD
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
147 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
