| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Server
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill that h |
 |
|
| #### |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sid9
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill th |
|
|
Dream on!
"Jack Granade" <jgranade@pioneernet.net> wrote in message
news:134h5c64bo3ha33@corp.supernews.com...
| Quote: |
Another pathetic bill by a do nothing congress. The polls are all done by
liberals and for liberals and do not reflect the disgust the American
people are staring to have for the defeatist Democrat cowards.
jack g
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4648940E.F3DB98A8@hotmMOVEail.com...
Charlie Wolf wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 18:09:20 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Three cheers for Congress!
1. Short term funding (2 mo only)
2. Then another vote on the balance.
54% of American disagree with bush,jr's arrogant veto
Sure Sid. And when you ask the same question by saying "Are you in
favor of surrender and defeat in Iraq for our military?" an
overwhelming majority say they are not in favor of Democrat sponsored
surrender.
You can back that claim up, can'tcha Chuckie? Hmmm?
RT
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rich Travsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill th |
|
|
Charlie Wolf wrote:
| Quote: |
On Tue, 8 May 2007 18:09:20 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Three cheers for Congress!
1. Short term funding (2 mo only)
2. Then another vote on the balance.
54% of American disagree with bush,jr's arrogant veto
Sure Sid. And when you ask the same question by saying "Are you in
favor of surrender and defeat in Iraq for our military?" an
overwhelming majority say they are not in favor of Democrat sponsored
surrender.
|
You can back that claim up, can'tcha Chuckie? Hmmm?
RT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jack Granade
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill th |
|
|
Another pathetic bill by a do nothing congress. The polls are all done by
liberals and for liberals and do not reflect the disgust the American people
are staring to have for the defeatist Democrat cowards.
jack g
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4648940E.F3DB98A8@hotmMOVEail.com...
| Quote: |
Charlie Wolf wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 18:09:20 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Three cheers for Congress!
1. Short term funding (2 mo only)
2. Then another vote on the balance.
54% of American disagree with bush,jr's arrogant veto
Sure Sid. And when you ask the same question by saying "Are you in
favor of surrender and defeat in Iraq for our military?" an
overwhelming majority say they are not in favor of Democrat sponsored
surrender.
You can back that claim up, can'tcha Chuckie? Hmmm?
RT |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sid9
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: PROGRESS REPORT: GOP Threatens to Leave Iraq |
|
|
"Stop The War" <stopthewar@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Dj%1i.149466$VU4.45775@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| Quote: |
"The Iraqi government is a huge disappointment," Senate Minority
Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN'S Late Edition on Sunday.
"So far, they've not been able do anything they promised on the
political
side," the Kentucky Republican said, citing the Iraqis' failure to
pass a new oil revenue bill, hold local elections and dismantle the
former Baath Party of Saddam Hussein. "It's a growing frustration."
"Republicans overwhelmingly feel disappointed about the Iraqi
government,"
he added. ...
"I want to assure you, if they vote to ask us to leave, we'll be
glad to comply with their request," he said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1325114220070513?feedType=RSS
TICK, TICK, TICK.
I think McConnell must not have cleared his statements with our Fuhrer.
TOCK, TOCK, TOCK.
|
The beginning of the end of
an American tragedy...the
bush,jr administration and
his failed war |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
HeadMuthaFookerInChargeTh
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: Re: Easter Offensive...AND Jan Fonda |
|
|
no more a stooge then the American people.............even you!
"Mac" <NoSpamToday@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:8p0f43lvdrk6mo01n11dmi9jb373oiaju8@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
Or, perhaps, Jane Fonda was quite the willing stooge?
HOWEVER, for all of her espousing of communism and/or socialism, she
sure does not practice what she preaches.
Mac, the Medic
**********************
On Sun, 13 May 2007 20:39:22 GMT, "HMFIC@1369.COM"
UNKNOWWHO@UKNOWWHERE.COM> wrote:
Like Tenent said "we don't use Torture" maybe the NV simply changed the
word
like we did.
**************************
"Mac" <NoSpamToday@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:lcse43dhtr4mlf3hgp1jfmaop7d6oif1jp@4ax.com...
If you are so mired in your own agenda as to claim you believe that
those political comments from President Nixon constitute the belief
system espoused by Jane Fonda in her many comments extrolling
socialism, extrolling communism, then that speaks volume regarding
your intent.
Whether you appreciate it or not, Jane Fonda made the statements she
did; she went to Hanoi; she did claim that the POWs were not
tortured, and she later claimed they were lying when they returned and
told the truth she desperately avoided.... etc., etc.
Mac, the Medic
===================
On Sun, 13 May 2007 15:26:32 GMT,
"HeadMuthaFookerInChargeThirteenSixtyNine" <The last one@laughing.com
wrote:
So do I have to print Nixons ass kissing suckup speech to the Chinese
Government, that predated Janes? You ignore facts, but then again that's
your own failure!
************************************************
"Mac" <NoSpamToday@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:o2ld431hu4s9k6vtdv8koa2c97ibeajda7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 12 May 2007 14:06:37 -0800, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com
wrote:
Mac wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 03:41:32 -0800, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com
wrote:
HMFIC@1369.COM wrote:
Look I'm more then willing to properly discuss anything..... But you
have to understand that with Bill & Rita, think they know, they think
they're right......
and thinking and being are to seperate things!
I think it took Jane a great deal of courage to go to Hanoi, and to
check on the POW's was an Honorable act. The sitting at the AA, and
the
way the US press siezed on her...is as much bullshit.
She's less a communist then Nixon!
********************************
Well, actually, we have her own words, her own claims.
That is fairly straight-forward.
Mac, the Medic
******************************
Little Johnny:
no you don't, son...i know for a fact some of your quotes were made up
by
you rightwing assholes
;-)
======== ==========
Really?
Nice try, but, no.
Those are Jane's own words, recorded in several instances.
AS FOR HER HAVING THE :Courage" to go to Hanoi, she claimed that the
POWs were NOT mistreated, were not tortured.
When the POWs returned and described how they were forced to meet with
her, and how they had been abused, little Janey stated they were
liars.
When Joan Baez asked little Janey to sign the letter protesting the
abuses of the North Vietnames running the South, little Janey refused,
saying one must not critize socialists, communists...
Mac, the Medic
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
DoD
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:32 am Post subject: Re: OUR TROOPS: US blocks soldiers from websites BBC |
|
|
"torresdD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Sz32i.9979$Ut6.4431@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| Quote: |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6655153.stm
US blocks soldiers from websites
Soldiers use the sites to
keep in touch with loved ones
The US military is blocking troops
from using certain websites for
sharing photos, video clips and messages.
|
What do you care? You hate our military anyways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sid9
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:34 am Post subject: Re: Deputy Attorney General McNulty Resigns |
|
|
"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179181012.430074.253450@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On May 14, 3:08 pm, "Bruce Olin" <bruce_o...@hotmail.com> wrote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty said Monday he
will
resign, the highest-ranking Bush administration casualty in the furor
over
the firing of U.S. attorneys, The Associated Press has learned.
He is claiming as his reason for leaving, that the job does not pay
enough for him to put his kids through college.
|
He needs more time with his family. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Timothy
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:34 am Post subject: Re: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill th |
|
|
On May 9, 6:07 pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Defeator surrend are not possible for the US in Iraq. It is impossible to
be defeated in another country's civil war. And Bush has no right to Iraq,
so there is nothing to surrender.
|
Besides, we WON the war over 4 years ago, didn't we? Has everyone
forgotten that glorious day of May 1, 2003 when Bush II personally
flew a jet out into the middle of the Pacific Ocean, made a tailhook
landing on the USS Abraham Lincoln, and did a victory dance on the
flight deck with his fellow fighting men and women before making his
"Mission Accomplished" speech? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
zzzpeace@yahoo.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:31 am Post subject: Re: Price tag for war in Iraq on track to top $500 billion |
|
|
The movie 13 Days is History all over again.
THIRTEEN DAYS is the story of the Cuban Missile crisis from the point
of view of Presidential advisor Kenneth O'Donnell.
The Chiefs of Staff were anxious to take on the Soviets in a war they
assumed they could limit. The Soviets also have their own divisions in
policy with hawks and doves in the Politburo.
The film exposes the bitter rivalry between those who want military
solutions and those who want diplomatic ones with
John Kennedy being indecisive between them, because he was haunted by
his reading of Barbara Tuchman's THE GUNS OF AUGUST, an account of how
both sides behaving in what at the time appeared logical ways
inexorably descended into the First World War.
Kennedy understood the fact that it could have happened with nuclear
missiles, this time.
Unfortunately, unlike the men who averted nuclear war with the Soviet
Union, the zealots who started the Iraq war have no sense of history,
and the invasion has predictably descended into what historian, David
Halberstam predicted, and you can read about that here:
http://surftofind.com/war
When you thoroughly examine all the evidence, especially what David
Halberstam said about the war in Iraq and the book he was planning to
write, it is sadly not possible to avoid the conclusion that, like
John F. Kennedy before him, David Halberstam is a victim of domestic,
cold war politics. The timely death of David Halberstam is being
called an accident, but history strongly suggests otherwise.
Murder is not a spontaneous act. Murder is a premeditated act of
violence which is cloaked and disguised in alternative explanations
like "auto accident" in order to evade accountability. Like John F.
Kennedy before him, David Halberstam is a victim of domestic cold war
politics and this time, the murderers should not get away with it.
http://surftofind.com/lawyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Billzz
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:33 am Post subject: Re: Price tag for war in Iraq on track to top $500 billion |
|
|
<zzzpeace@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179185495.657911.198640@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
The movie 13 Days is History all over again.
THIRTEEN DAYS is the story of the Cuban Missile crisis from the point
of view of Presidential advisor Kenneth O'Donnell.
The Chiefs of Staff were anxious to take on the Soviets in a war they
assumed they could limit. The Soviets also have their own divisions in
policy with hawks and doves in the Politburo.
The film exposes the bitter rivalry between those who want military
solutions and those who want diplomatic ones with
John Kennedy being indecisive between them, because he was haunted by
his reading of Barbara Tuchman's THE GUNS OF AUGUST, an account of how
both sides behaving in what at the time appeared logical ways
inexorably descended into the First World War.
Kennedy understood the fact that it could have happened with nuclear
missiles, this time.
Unfortunately, unlike the men who averted nuclear war with the Soviet
Union, the zealots who started the Iraq war have no sense of history,
and the invasion has predictably descended into what historian, David
Halberstam predicted, and you can read about that here:
http://surftofind.com/war
When you thoroughly examine all the evidence, especially what David
Halberstam said about the war in Iraq and the book he was planning to
write, it is sadly not possible to avoid the conclusion that, like
John F. Kennedy before him, David Halberstam is a victim of domestic,
cold war politics. The timely death of David Halberstam is being
called an accident, but history strongly suggests otherwise.
Murder is not a spontaneous act. Murder is a premeditated act of
violence which is cloaked and disguised in alternative explanations
like "auto accident" in order to evade accountability. Like John F.
Kennedy before him, David Halberstam is a victim of domestic cold war
politics and this time, the murderers should not get away with it.
http://surftofind.com/lawyer
|
Kenny O'Donnell writing a book?
You might want to read "The Dark Side of Camelot" by Seymour M. Hersh to
find out what Kenny's real job was.
Kennedy lost the Berlin Wall crisis, and the Cuban Missile crisis, making
secret appeasements each time. His advisors thought that he was being seen
as "soft on communism" and advised moving the arena to southeast asia,
increasing support to South Vietnam, and for only one reason - to win
reelection. Anyway, if you like conspiracy theories, then you'll love this
book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Fafnir
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:50 am Post subject: Re: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill th |
|
|
In article <134h5c64bo3ha33@corp.supernews.com>
"Jack Granade" <jgranade@pioneernet.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
Another pathetic bill by a do nothing congress.
|
Doing nothing suits me just fine.
No war funding bill, no war.
But the Democrats are smarter than that - they keep passing war funding bills, and Bush keeps vetoing them - so it's HIS fault that the troops aren't getting the funds they need.
The Democrats have Bush by the short hairs, and they know it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sid9
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:55 am Post subject: Re: Democrats will deliver bush,jr a new war funding bill th |
|
|
"Fafnir" <fritz@spamexpire-200705.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote in
message news:e4ccd4e54952e1c7bc2179666b3e13a4@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
| Quote: |
In article <134h5c64bo3ha33@corp.supernews.com
"Jack Granade" <jgranade@pioneernet.net> wrote:
Another pathetic bill by a do nothing congress.
Doing nothing suits me just fine.
No war funding bill, no war.
But the Democrats are smarter than that - they keep passing war funding
bills, and Bush keeps vetoing them - so it's HIS fault that the troops
aren't getting the funds they need.
The Democrats have Bush by the short hairs, and they know it!
|
They need to fund one way
tickets home for all of our troops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sgt. Giggles of the Kamik
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:57 am Post subject: Re: US says troops held by 'al-Qaeda' BBC |
|
|
On May 14, 2:30 pm, "torresdD" <torres...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
USA Military Soldiers, are well armed, with top notch weapons.
How can they be kidnapped, just like that?
I don't get it.
|
It's a black op.
Torture and kill some of your own to get the country behind the big
"surge" to VICTORY!!
| Quote: |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6653189.stm
US says troops held by 'al-Qaeda'
US troops are operating in some
of their most dangerous areas
The US military in Iraq says it
believes three of its soldiers
missing after an ambush have
been abducted by militants from,
or linked to, al-Qaeda.
Some 4,000 US soldiers are searching
for the three men, who disappeared
on Saturday after their patrol came
under attack south of Baghdad.
The Islamic State of Iraq,
an umbrella group of militants
led by al-Qaeda,
says it is holding the soldiers.
It told the US to stop searching
for them if it wanted their safety.
"Your soldiers are in our hands,"
the group said in a statement
posted on an Islamist website.
"If you want them safe,
do not search for them."
There were no pictures of the
soldiers to back up the group's
claim.
'Highly credible intelligence'
The attack on the patrol,
in the town of Mahmudiya,
left four US soldiers and
an Iraqi interpreter dead.
"At this time, we believe they
(the three missing soldiers) were
abducted by terrorists belonging
to al-Qaeda or an affiliated group
and this assessment is based on highly
credible intelligence information,"
chief military spokesman
Major-General William
Caldwell said.
US troops are carrying out an
intensive search in the area,
known as the Triangle of Death
because attacks by insurgents
are so common.
Officials said operations were
focussing on Mahmudiya's outlying
towns and villages.
"US and Iraqi forces are cordoning
off the farmsteads and orchards in
all these areas,"
Mahmudiya Mayor Moad al-Amiri said.
In the town of town of Yousifiya,
US troops broadcast warnings for
residents to stay indoors,
as units searched house-to-house
for the missing men.
Forces on the ground around
Yousifiya were being supported
by aircraft and satellites.
Gen Caldwell said that the search
would continue until the men were found.
Last year,
two American soldiers were
kidnapped in the same area -
their bodies were found
several days later.
Elsewhere in Iraq,
at least eight people were reported
killed in a series of attacks in and
around Baghdad. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sgt. Giggles of the Kamik
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:08 am Post subject: Re: OUR TROOPS: US blocks soldiers from websites BBC |
|
|
On May 14, 2:32 pm, "DoD" <navyd...@excite.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"torresdD" <torres...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Sz32i.9979$Ut6.4431@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6655153.stm
US blocks soldiers from websites
Soldiers use the sites to
keep in touch with loved ones
The US military is blocking troops
from using certain websites for
sharing photos, video clips and messages.
What do you care? You hate our military anyways.
|
..........but we love to see naked women soldiers on youtube!
Fuckin' gubmint! Always spoiling everybody's fun.;o( |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
147 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
