Society Issues Talk Society Issues Talk    FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  LIBBY FOUND GUILTY Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 961, 962, 963  Next          Society Issues Talk Forum Index -> Liberalism View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message Amanda Williams Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:52 pm    Post subject: Re: FRANCE SAYS, "YOU REPORT MUSLIM VIOLENCE", YOU GO TO JAI Harold Burton <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> allegedly said in news:hal.i.burton-CE267E.20060406032007@comcast.dca.giganews.com: Quote: In article <Xns98EBC6D20AFEDfubar@63.218.45.254>, Amanda Williams <pms@fu.com> wrote: Well that would exclude YOU and the rest of your dumb reichtard butt- buddies goober... rotfl... What a typical leftard response. Thank you Mandy. You are most welcome harry. But there is no need for thanks... I am always ready to help the less fortunate among us. I am just a nice person that way. -- AW <small but dangerous> Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor lubow Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Amazing Parallels I was joint pointing out the similarities of the death of a presidential administration and the death of a loved one. In one case it was physical systems shutting down one after the other -- lungs, vascular and heart. In the case of Nixon, his fall started in the office of the VP, then came his own cover-ups and lies and personal issues with the tax man. Now, it's over 30 years later and we see another GOP administration falling one system after the other. First, the office of the VP. Now constant lies and cover-ups about the Administration not supporting our troops. I soon expect the news people to start pouring over Cheney's finances and "what he knew and when he knew it." There is no doubt that one Saturday Night Massacre is about to come to fruition within the next year. -- Lubow "What Me Worry?" <__@____.___> wrote in message news:Vc6dnW-EoJ1FoXPYnZ2dnUVZ_uygnZ2d@insightbb.com... Quote: "lubow" <lubow@lubow-industries.com> wrote in message news:HwnHh.8004$Tf.3645@trndny03... When I see the newsrats start to tear apart a presidential administration, I am saddened because it reminds me of the death of my mom. First it was her asthma, then phlebitis, then gangrene and after a stent insertion, the ticker went. It was one system shutting down after the other in almost rapid succession. It was the same thing with the Nixon Administration. First, there was a scandal involving VP Spiro T. Agnew. Agnew was late for his own inauguration because he was collecting money from Maryland contractors. Then came the Pentagon Papers and Plumbers raiding Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office. They got away with it and went after a bigger target at the Watergate. Then came stories of Nixon not paying his income tax. And just like the cascading woe of my mom's health, came the Saturday Night Massacre, the missing 22(?) minutes of tape and finally Nixon's resignation. And now it's 30 years later and once again there is trouble in the office of the VP. Parallels, parallels, parallels. Ok, I don't understand. Are you *mourning* the Nixon resignation, after admitting that his administration was shot through with corruption? Do you *want* corruption? Or not? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Captain Steve Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Raising the minimum wage destroys jobs On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:19:31 -0800, 3185 Dead <zepp22113185@finestplanet.com> wrote: Quote: On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:38:54 -0500, MikeSoja <msoja9@newsguy.com wrote: On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:11:05 -0500, Jeffrey Turner jturner@localnet.com> posted: MikeSoja wrote: On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:38:29 -0800, 3172 Dead zepp22113172@finestplanet.com> posted: On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:53:02 -0500, MikeSoja <msoja9@newsguy.com wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:29:03 -0600, Mitchell Holman NoemailPlease@comcast.com> posted: Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote: Giving across the board tax cuts doesn't make the wealthy and corporations put the extra funds under the mattress. They invest it in the economy, which causes economic growth and an increase in the number of jobs. So when said corporation uses it's extra funds to build a new factory in China and then fire all their American workers how does that lead to an "increase in the number of jobs"? Using anecdote to counter generality is a form of low ignorance, Mitch, but that's what you consistantly do. Explain then, where all the manufacturing jobs went, sistah soja. Did the tooth fairy exchange them for quarters for all the little boys and girls? Unemployment is 4.6%, Pighead. And the official poverty rate is about 12.6%. What? You see one percentage figure and feel compelled to offer another on a different subject? Sounds like a good-sized chunk of the workforce is in poverty, Sistah Soja. Of course one must remember that many of the people living below the poverty rate in the USA have color TV and cell-phones... take Zepp, himself, for example. Quote: Is that more of the crapola about how the free market is good for everyone? I had no idea poverty was that low, though. Thanks. And median family income has fallen every year Bush has been president. As far as I know, the only impediments Bush has tossed in front of the economy unicycle are things like increases in Ed. spending, Medicare entitlement crap, throwing millions or billions at people who think it's just the finest thing to live below sea level in a hurricane zone, and by going along with the helpful Dems on every other wasteful grant for idiocy that came down the pike. In other words, Jeffey, it's been business as usual out in D.C. and if you think it would have helped things to have kept taxes high so that the government could find more and bigger ways to waste it, then you are exactly as stupid as I think you are. Of course, if you had your way, unemployment would be 0% and all the stores would be fully stocked with buggy whips. You're the one voting for reactionaries who want to restore the good old days of the nineteenth century. Cite, Jeffey? Or is that all your brain could come up with to close the post after the main inanities of whatever point you were trying to make. Mike Soja Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Roger Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Amazing Parallels Bush is a MASS MURDERER. Nixon was a CROOK. Bush has gotten off easy until recently. He deserves everything he gets. "lubow" <lubow@lubow-industries.com> wrote in message news:HwnHh.8004$Tf.3645@trndny03... Quote: When I see the newsrats start to tear apart a presidential administration, I am saddened because it reminds me of the death of my mom. First it was her asthma, then phlebitis, then gangrene and after a stent insertion, the ticker went. It was one system shutting down after the other in almost rapid succession. It was the same thing with the Nixon Administration. First, there was a scandal involving VP Spiro T. Agnew. Agnew was late for his own inauguration because he was collecting money from Maryland contractors. Then came the Pentagon Papers and Plumbers raiding Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office. They got away with it and went after a bigger target at the Watergate. Then came stories of Nixon not paying his income tax. And just like the cascading woe of my mom's health, came the Saturday Night Massacre, the missing 22(?) minutes of tape and finally Nixon's resignation. And now it's 30 years later and once again there is trouble in the office of the VP. Parallels, parallels, parallels. -- Lubow Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Kevin Cunningham Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Brainwashed <Joseph> wrote in message news:2cudnar-XPgYWHHYnZ2dnUVZ_uygnZ2d@comcast.com... Quote: I rewrote this to be a little more clear. The US Society is being brainwashed into thinking that the only Rights that they have, are described in, and Protected by the US Constitution or the Bill of Rights. However those are just Words on Pieces of Paper. A woman's Right to say no at any time that she chooses, is not written or protected there. Does that mean that she does not have that Right? Can anyone write Words on any Piece of Paper, and take away that Right? If they did, only treacherous Bigots and Tyrants called Traitors, or Sinners, or Infidels, or Criminals, would use it to justify themselves, for allowing and enforcing such stupidity. The US Society is being brainwashed into thinking that Politicians or Judges or Lawyers can write Words on Pieces of Paper, that take away your Rights. And they are being brainwashed into thinking that the Politicians or Judges or Lawyers or Officers, are justified by their Pieces of Paper, for being treacherous Bigots and Tyrants, called Traitors, Sinners, Infidels, or Criminals, that allow and enforce such stupidity. They write a Law or Regulation that restricts or takes away your Rights, and scream, "The Law allows us to get away with that much!" But that is called, Regulatory Tyranny! All our Rights whither written in the US Constitution or the Bill of Rights or not, are protected by the tone of our voice, and whatever demeanor is necessary to enforce them. And at times that may mean we will be counted by Government Officials and their Supporters, to be as crazy and criminal, as the Regulatory Tyranny of King George the 3rd, counted George Washington and his gang of Rebels. Defending our Rights from treacherous Bigots and Tyrants, called Traitors, Sinners, Infidels, or Criminals, are the reasons that we have so many names written on our War Memorials, and written on our Civil Police Memorials. Joseph Joseph, I'd like to reply to this but there is no there, there. Your writing is just awful from the weird capitalization to the meaningless end. No points. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Kevin Cunningham Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Why does Bush call Islam a "peaceful religion"? "Jim E" <YD655359@SEA.edu> wrote in message news:554a9mF21mejaU1@mid.individual.net... Quote: "NeverExpectPowerAlways" <don't_even_ask@noway.com> wrote in message news:i44Hh.179$FG1.141@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... Jim E wrote: "NeverExpectPowerAlways" <don't_even_ask@noway.com> wrote in message news:M8%Gh.439$yW.300@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net... Straight from the White House: President's Ramadan Message, October 24, 2003 "Islam is a peaceful religion, and people who practice the Islamic faith have made great contributions to our Nation and the world." ~George W. Bush http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/20031024-10.html "We recognize that Islam is a peaceful religion which teaches respect and tolerance." ~White House Global Message for October 23, 2003 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/20031023.html MR. McCLELLAN: Well, again, Islam is a peaceful religion. It is a religion that preaches peace. And the President has made that very clear repeatedly. ~Former WH Press Secretary Scott McClellan Look up the word diplomacy you cretin. Look up the word hypocrite. If you weren't such a cretin you would know that the two are synonimous for a reason. Jim E Minor problem. I looked up both words in an online dictionary and, surprise!, there not synonamous. Nope, there quite different. Now a person could be both a cretin and a hypocrite, you for instance. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Paul Duca Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:30 pm    Post subject: Re: BILL CLINTON FEB 4, 1998 "One way or another, we are det in article 45ee53db$0$8989$4c368faf@roadrunner.com, CB at CB@PrayForMe.com wrote on 3/7/07 12:56 AM: Quote: "Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message news:45EE326B.2007B32F@hotmMOVEail.com... CB wrote: "Loki Laufeyjarson" <BadNews@NoLooters.com> wrote in message news:vc6mu21o2ae07npdmk6btno1b35r9t3p5q@4ax.com... On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:21:29 -0700, Rich Travsky traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote: CB wrote: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020926-7.html ... The danger to our country is grave. The danger to our country is growing. The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons. The Iraqi regime is building the facilities necessary to make more biological and chemical weapons. And according to the British government, the Iraqi regime could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order were given. Thanks for posting this. BEFORE the LONG overdue resumption of the original gulf war on Saddam's murderous regime, what you describe above is an accurate summary of what was actually believed to be true (at that time) by every single responsible security organization on Earth! The fact that it MIGHT have been LESS true than was widely believed, does not in any way alter the moral validity of invading Iraq because that invasion WAS motivated by a sincere belief, AND, even WITHOUT WMD's in the hands of Saddam, the world IS better off now than it would have been had Saddam remained in power. The sanity, security and prosperity of the entire world will be FAR better off if Iraq has a stable, free, even quasi-democratic government. An Iraq that can finally break free of a, murderous, medieval religion and join the 21st Century cannot be anything but good for the entire world. It puts a real thorn in Ahmadinejad's plan for a united Persia and take over of OPEC No, Iraq was the check against Iran. Idiot Chimpoleon removed that check. America will stay in Iraq until Iraq can defend her self, period And then God will pat people like CB on their head after they die... Paul Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor lab~rat >:-) Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Lets Not Forget: Cinton Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Bef On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:42:17 -0800, Blazing Laser puked: Quote: On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:04:56 GMT, "lab~rat >" <chase@cheeze.net wrote: Prove they were innocent. Oh brother! Prove the 3000 people killed on 9/11 were innocent! Those 3000 people didn't die in combat. You people have gone off the deep end. -- lab~rat > Do you want polite or do you want sincere? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor lab~rat >:-) Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Lets Not Forget: Cinton Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Bef On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:10:35 GMT, salad <oil@vinegar.com> puked: Quote: lab~rat > wrote: On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:35:40 GMT, salad <oil@vinegar.com> puked: Hillary Clinton Chavez wrote: "Patrick" <phenry@usa.new> wrote in message news:k8xwamvn3lf0$.1w4al97qo5rm$.dlg@40tude.net... On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:00:45 -0500, Democrat Communist Hugo Chavez Ass Lickers wrote: Regime change in Iraq became a stated goal of United States foreign policy when Public Law 105-338 (the "Iraq Liberation Act") was signed into law by U.S. President Bill Clinton. The act directed that: "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." Let's not forget that Clinton didn't order the invasion and occupation of Iraq. ================== Yeah, he only blew up Iraqi's for 4 straight days of relentless bombings in 1998 Desert Fox War on Iraq. Pretty damn good shooting the military did. Wiped out Saddam's WMDs. And a milk factory. That was in another country. And damn good shooting there. The military disliked Clinton but they did a good job under him. Under bush, they're doing lousy. Why's that? Because bush has the Midas Touch of Shit. Really? I thought it was because any skirmish Clinton drug us into was a push button war where thousands of innocent people were killed without regard. I guess Iraq should have been one, too... -- lab~rat > Do you want polite or do you want sincere? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor lab~rat >:-) Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Lets Not Forget: Cinton Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Bef On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:20:03 GMT, salad <oil@vinegar.com> puked: Quote: Blazing Laser wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:45:36 -0500, "Hillary Clinton Chavez" HillaryChavez for President@USA.com> wrote: Gee, Even Clinton does not claim the lies that you do. When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for . . . it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks . . . " said Clinton recently on "Larry King Live." Also, Clinton said he never found out whether a U.S.-British bombing campaign he ordered in 1998 ended Saddam's stockpiles of or his capability of producing chemical and biological weapons. "We might have gotten it all, we might have gotten half of it, we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know," said Clinton. It's funny, you guys always accuse Clinton of lying, just about everything he says you call a lie. But when he says something that supports your case you give it full credit. Clinton was covering his tracks. None of the Democrats had the guts to say Saddam was no threat to us, that the sanctions and the UN had him effectively boxed in, and that the UN inspection regime was working well (which, in retrospect, it was!) If everyone knew the WMD existed, if there was such good evidence of them, then why was most of the evidence the Bush admin. presented based on lies? Also Patrick is right. Despite political palaver, Clinton wasn't stupid enough to invade Iraq and occupy it. Even Bush's dad knew better than to depose Saddam when he had the chance, knowing what a can of worms it would become. Bush blundered into Iraq because he really knew nothing about it. He ignored the advice of every real expert and instead listened to the likes of Wolfowitz and Perle, who were motivated by ideology but didn't really have the background to know what would happen. Bush has nobody to blame but himself. Damn right he didn't know a thing about it. Sir Frederick Maude marched into Baghdad in March 1917. After fighting the Ottoman army for 2 1/2 years and suffering one of the worst defeats in WWI in Kut, he declared "You have been oppressed by 400 years of Ottoman rule. Your lands are subject to tyranny. Your wealth has been stripped from you by unjust men." He then asked the Iraqis (of that time) to work together with the British in their politics. Maude died 8 months later from drinking spoiled milk. In 1920, the Iraqis revolted against British rule. 131,000 insurgents rallied to the cause with 17,000 rifles left over from WWI. 2000 British troops and 8450 Iraqis died in the revolt. Took a couple of years to get control but by that time it was a manpower draining financial rathole for the British. Iraq has been a thorn in the side of the British for many years. Just as it will be for the US. The situation of 1920 eerily resembles today. Lot's of relevance there. Can you write up a story about the dinosaurs that used to roam the deserts? That is actually a little more closer to home because it has something to do with oil being there. In the early 20th century, that was of little concern. -- lab~rat > Do you want polite or do you want sincere? Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Sorry Harry.......... "Docky Wocky" <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in message news:RTrHh.396$mh.12@trnddc05... Quote: If Bubba Clinton had been tried by a real jury, he'd still be busting rocks. Excellent point. Dennis Quote: Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Tim Crowley Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Rethinking birthright citizenship some more (for the lan On Mar 7, 2:14 am, "The Pervert" <perver...@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote: Quote: After the hateful and lying bullshit you've posted, even my extensive vocabulary cannot find words to describe how much I could not possibly care less about how you feel about what I post. Like I said, you don't want to talk about immigration. You're just a troll. Bye, you join Rudy in ignore land. You're worthless. Enjoy your life "pervert" - the name really does suit you well. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:53 pm    Post subject: Re: POKING THE BEAR: Rush Declares Jihad on Libs! "rms" <rsquiresREMOVE@REMOVEflash.net> wrote in message news:QBrHh.13183$bb1.2492@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net... Quote: Rush Limbaugh today, emulating bin Laden's deputy Ayman Al Zawahiri, darkly hinted that Republican sleeper cells, dormant since the suspiciously democratic November Night Of Long Knives, have been triggered into action by recent legal events casting light on the Administration of the Boy King and his Ministers, and would arise to smite the uppity clintonian baby-eaters. All righteous believers must listen and behold the prophecy of The One And Only True Conservative: Apparently Rush's humor is too hip and nuanced for you. Dennis Quote: http://movies.crooksandliars.com/poking-the-bear.mp3 rms Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Jeffrey Scott Linder Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Raising the minimum wage destroys jobs Mitchell Holman <NoemailPlease@comcast.com> wrote: Quote: linder.one@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote in news:45ed60c7.333528546 @nntp.service.ohio-state.edu: Mitchell Holman <NoemailPlease@comcast.com> wrote: linder.one@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote in news:45ec4d15.262948890 @nntp.service.ohio-state.edu: Mitchell Holman <NoemailPlease@comcast.com> wrote: linder.one@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote in news:45ec1733.249178531 @nntp.service.ohio-state.edu: Mitchell Holman <NoemailPlease@comcast.com> wrote: Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in news:ts1nu2db41avvjgsfp863sfnepb1j1d2lk@4ax.com: Mitchell Holman <NoemailPlease@comcast.com> wrote: Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote The only good thing about Bush's economic policies is that he spends less than Al Grrrr or ketchup boy would have spent. Obviously sucking less than the alternatives is nothing to brag about. Oh, puh-leeze. Clinton balanced the budget and so could have any other succeeding Democrat. LOL, obviously you have forgotten about HillaryCare, Mitchy. You mean the proposal that was abandoned after mucho lobbying from the Insurance Lobby in 1993 and never enacted? Never enacted? You mean never even submitted in the House don't you? Same result. So how did a health care proposal that was never even submitted impact the budget? I don't know...I never said it did or didn't. What did that have to do with the balanced budgets that Clinton submitted in 1998 and 1999? Can you provide a link to those budgets? It's called the Congressional Budget Office. Joe Bob say Check It Out http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1821&sequence=0 "Sorry, this document is not available. This document is currently not available in this format, either because it has not been released or has been deleted." BJ's big spending agenda failed miserably. He was forced to show some fiscal responsibility because the voters bitch slapped him in 1994. Name for us one Republican who voted for Clintons Deficit Reduction Act that actually reduced the deficit. Just one, any one. Put his name right here:________________________ crickets Not one Republican..you're right. It took a tie breaking vote by Al Gore...that's how much the Democrats were behind it. Yep. Republicans were so concerned about balanced budgets that they tried to amend the constitution over it. But when a plan to create one is put in front of them they ran away. Post one budget that Clinton submittee that showed a balanced budget please. Presidents don't have subcommittees. Can you or can you not post a budget by submitted by Clinton that showed a balanced budget...ever? JSL Quote: President Clinton announces another record budget surplus CNN September 27, 2000 WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton announced Wednesday that the federal budget surplus for fiscal year 2000 amounted to at least $230 billion, making it the largest in U.S. history and topping last year's record surplus of $122.7 billion. The federal budget surplus for fiscal year 1999 was $122.7 billion, and $69.2 billion for fiscal year 1998. Those back-to-back surpluses, the first since 1957, allowed the Treasury to pay down $138 billion in national debt. http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/ Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor dxAce Guest Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Why Don't White Multicultural Cheerleaders Live In A Lat David Eduardo wrote: Quote: skm1942@msn.com> wrote in message news:1173017982.475179.144720@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com... On Mar 3, 7:26 am, "David Eduardo" <amda...@pacbell.com> wrote: bjackson...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1172926892.403877.63860@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com... Why is it that these hypocrites ie. white multicultural cheerleaders, always seem to live in lily white neighborhoods? Why don't they practice what they preach and move into a heavily black or heavily hispanic neighorhood AND put their kids in the local public school which is majority black or hispanic? I am probably in the group you seem to despise; I live in an area that is over 33% Hispanic, my kids went to schools where the majority was always Hispanic. So? That proves nothing. Aw come on David. You may live in an area with a large hispanic population but you don't live in the poor neighborhoods that they do. The desert area where you live there are many affluent and gated communities of which I am sure is actually where you live, not in the poor neighborhoods. That's a weekend home, and you are correct, it is gated and pretty nice. My neighbors on either side (it's a townhouse) are Hispanic. One is a doctor, and the other owns several business ventures. I'd guess that on my street about 25% of the homes are owned by Hispanics or Asians. I'd advise anyone to actually try to check out any and all of Edweenies stories. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         Society Issues Talk Forum Index -> Liberalism All times are GMT Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 961, 962, 963  Next Page 2 of 963   Jump to: Select a forum Society Issues Talk----------------Society Issues TalkDemocracyLiberalism  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum 150 Attacks blocked Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group